May 2007
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
    Jun »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

Day May 25, 2007

Entries 2 Total

Talk of Tomorrow

May 25, 07 11:48 PM

Wanna put money on it?  All day tomorrow, we will be hearing about this new “report” released that swears the Bush administration was “warned” about the trouble of going into Iraq. 

Tonight; less than an hour ago, Katherine Shrader of the AP reports the following:

  • “Intelligence analysts predicted, in secret papers circulated within the government before the Iraqinvasion, that al-Qaida would see U.S. military action as an opportunity to increase its operations and that Iran would try to shape a post-Saddam Iraq.”
  • “The top analysts in government also said that establishing a stable democracy in Iraq would be a “long, difficult and probably turbulent process.”"
  • “Democrats said the newly declassified documents, part of a Senate Intelligence Committee investigation released Friday, make clear that the Bush administration was warned about the very challenges it now faces as it tries to stabilize Iraq.”
  • “”Sadly, the administration’s refusal to heed these dire warnings — and worse, to plan for them — has led to tragic consequences for which our nation is paying a terrible price,” said Senate Intelligence Chairman Jay Rockefeller, D-W.Va.”         

So, I guess it’s safe to say that taxpayers paid to fund “analysts” to tell us that fighting a war would be difficult.  Who could imagine?  I wonder how many analysts were paid with Americans’ tax dollars to predict losing 300,000 Americans during WW2.

I guess it’s safe to assume now that liberals and the MSM believe that keeping Saddam in power would have indeed been the optimum condition.

I guess it’s safe to say that Jay Rockefeller would have done nothing in response to Saddam’s threats to the United Nations after 9/11.  I think it’s also fair to assume that no Democrat would fight any war for the off-chance that the enemy might shoot back. 

What a stupid waste of time!  Since when do we need analysts and committees to tell us that introducing an entire new way of life to a nation of people accustomed to cowering in corners while refraining from speaking out against their government for fear of being fed through wood chippers (Saddam had a peaceful way of maintaining civility) would be difficult and challenging?

Thanks God the Nazis weren’t difficult and challening, eh?

Comments (2)

It’s all about the little things:

May 25, 07 1:26 PM

 I absolutely love when Democrats get all “serious” as Alan Colmes did with Ann Coulter when she started laughing at his and Jane Flemings’ assertion that 76% of Americans are against the war.  France, Canada, Australia, England are all prime examples of how liberal the rest of the world is!  While the America-hating left goes around spouting their phony concerns about the rest of the world hating us (trust me nobody could hate America as much as liberals do), they seem to keep forgetting that the rest of the world are electing conservative leaders! 

 Now, after the Democrats (the same Democrats that gained control of both houses almost a half-year ago) have sold out their lunatic-base, we can point out that apparently these stupid-phony polls that nutball liberals like Rosie O’Donnell keep yapping about are INACCURATE.  Democrats’ votes in the House and Senate, and ACTUAL elections all over the world are what we like to call true and OBJECTIVE evidence of the nation’s AND world’s opinion on security and conservatism.

Say, can we get Hillary and Obama to make statements this week condemning the same bill that the Democrats passed this week?  That may be too much to ask, I suppose.

Just looking at how unhappy Jane Fleming and Alan Colmes look is good enough for me.  They sound like such sore-losers when Coulter consistently giggles throughout the debate.

Leave a Comment
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 173 other followers