A great liberal-loony-9/11 conspiracy theorist left the following comment regarding the conspiracy leftists’ campaign to elect Ron Paul:
“I hear he based the votes for his entire career on the “Constitution.””
FINALLY – a liberal agrees that abortion is non-constitutional!
Read the following:
“Roe v. Wade was wrongly decided … because abortion simply is not a constitutional issue. There is not a word in the text of that document, nor in any of its amendments, that conceivably addresses abortion. There is no serious argument based on the text of the Constitution itself that a federal ‘right to abortion’ exists.”
Ron Paul – 01/30/2006
So now we have two types of “one dimensional” liberals. The ones who believe in voting only on abortion and the ones that are blaming 9/11 on the United States. Apparently Ron Paul agrees that there are no rights to abortion in the Constitution. Someone at NARAL needs to be alerted real soon that they are being sold out by liberals (and I thought I’d never say this) that are even MORE insane than they are.
steveflesher
Philip
Mel Maguire
Mark Ciavola
Comments
Why do you give this stuff so much attention? Isn’t it a waste of time?
Seeings as its 100% impossible for Ron Paul to win the Republican primary, I’d say you were right.
But it’s so much fun. Kind of like watching the Anna Nicole show. It was a trainwreck, but I laughed ALOT!
You watched Anna Nicole’s Show? You must have alot of time on your hands.
Also, why the bashing of Ron Paul? I can understand going after the 9/11 guys but RP’s record is unmatched. The more conservative than any candidate and actually follows the Constitution which is rare. Lumping him together with the 9/11 people does a discredit to a good man whether you agree w/ all his positions or not.
Well, I do work, go to school, and make time between homework assignments to play on the web having fun with liberals so I just might have almost as much time on my hands as someone who manages to write two posts within 15 minutes on a topic that he claims is a “waste of time.”
Somehow the song “True Colors” comes to mind.
“Also, why the bashing of Ron Paul? I can understand going after the 9/11 guys but RP’s record is unmatched. The more conservative than any candidate and actually follows the Constitution which is rare. Lumping him together with the 9/11 people does a discredit to a good man whether you agree w/ all his positions or not.”
Ah so apparently it IS something you care about. Actually I don’t personally care about Ron Paul being a threat as I said I know he’d never win the primary within the Republican base. It is; however, 9/11 conspiracy theorists (as I pointed out) that are endorsing him. They are the ones I am commenting on.
Moreover; I mentioned that it was a good thing that they were at least NOT endorsing Dennis Kucinich or John Edwards and that it wasn’t all bad news.
Did you miss that part?
It’s a waste of time for someone like yourself who doesn’t care about RP or 9/11 truthers. That was my point. I’m interested in RP b/c he’s the most conservative candidate in my lifetime. That’s all.
Lord, you just said that you could understand someone going after the 9/11 guys but I shouldn’t touch RP. (see a few posts up.)
I could bash RP if I cared – but I know he isn’t a threat. But I didn’t “bash” him. In fact he and I agree on abortion.
Republicans would be getting a lot more out of him winning the election than Democrats would on the social issues.
I will say that standing on TV and saying we provoked 9/11 sort of puts him in the same ballpark as the 9/11 conspiracy folk.
Why? The CIA, 911 Commission Report, AND even Paul Wolfowitz said the exact same thing that Paul said – that our occupation in the middle east breeds hatred, not “our freedoms”.
Is it kooky for the Head of the CIA’s Bin Laden Unit to say our Middle East occupation breeds anti-Americanism? Is he a kook?
Plus, it was Ron Paul that exposed himself as belonging to the liberal crowd when he blamed the U.S. for 9/11 during the recent Republican debate.
Steve, you’re just exposing the foibles of those who don’t have a chance, but have put their ideas out there for us to comment on. If they don’t want to have their ideas (or lack thereof) scrutinized, don’t run for President!
Tyler, yes, correct, all of the above.
First, the CIA Bin Laden unit was disbanded in 2006. Second, I know Michael Schurer has been a little ticked at the U.S. since they halted the special unit. Finally, he wasn’t an actual operative for the CIA – he was an analyst brought in.
Since, he’s managed to write two books and I’ve noticed him on O’Reilly before mentioning that on one hand he thinks we need to end Iraq but on the other hand he thinks we need to start killing more of the enemy is larger numbers OR a more efficient manner.
I half-way agree with him.
Finally, the US hasn’t bred any hate. They’ve always hated us, and they always will. What you may be construing as “hate” may be what I define as the enemy “shooting back.” Looks like the enemy’s “dear attempt” tactics are working just great on some.
Devil Dog – you make a good point. I was mainly trying to have fun with a few 9/11 conspiracy crazies and I thought it was hilarious that the one fella stated that he agreed with RP because he “votes based on the Constitution” while I simutaneously remember how anti Roe v Wade Ron Paul is.
Ron Paul is not a liberal. Fwiw, Scheuer quit the cIA before his unit was disbandaed. Lastly, Ron Paul didn’t BLAME the US for 9/11. He candidly acknowledged what Bin Laden’s motives. While it may be tru that Islamists hate us, they would never be able to summon any real support for their cause unless they can connect their hatred to US policies which they despise. OBL cited 6 specific American policies which he claimed he would retaliate for. You can hear about it in this interview with Michael Scheuer: http://dissentradio.com/radio/07_05_18_scheuer.mp3
1.) I’ve acknowledged a million times that RP is not a liberal on social issues. Thus my point on how crazy 9/11 conspiracy leftists are when they go around endorising folks – check out his “abortion” quotes. He may be even more “pro-life” than Thompson.
2.) Scheuer resigned in 1999 but indeed remained at large in publlic opinion. He indeed expressed opposition to disbanding the 9/11 group and he was not a paid CIA operative as others like to portray him as.
3.) For 20+ years, our interests have been attacked by these crazies. It’s our way of life they hate and resent. There have been attacks throughout the world and mid-east in areas where there were no forces. Ron Paul is nothing short of making excuses for terrorists.
4.) Any relation to Hugh G Rectum?
“For 20+ years, our interests have been attacked by these crazies.”
Only 20? We have been screwing with them for over 60..
No Sam, France started it during the earlier part of the century by trying to normalize a bunch of tribes in the middle east. When it failed, they then left the mess to the British and then the US got stuck with the brunt.
More excuses for terrorism. Those poor, sad, victimized terrorists with no choice.
This is why we say leftists, crazies, 9/11 conspiracy loons, and terrorists all have one thing in common. They blame and hate America.
Liberals love handing out victim status to people. It’s almost an honor to them. But terrorists aren’t writhing in victim mode to join your team – they are killing infidels in record numbers.