Madonna: More Hollywood Hypocrisy

m.jpg 

Roger Friedman of Fox News uncovered many secrets of the material girl and her foundations that own stock in many of the corporations that Al Gore, Leonardo DiCaprio, and other tree-huggers are detesting and blaming for the Earth’s destruction.

Madonna is the headline at the “Live Earth” show in London which is happening this weekend.  (With many SUV’s and bodyguards to guarantee her security, giving light with the attacks in London last weekend.)

Roger Friedman reports the following:

“Madonna, who seems to be on top of all her many business endeavors, has actually invested about $2.7 million dollars in companies that are creating the destruction that Live Earth is trying to raise awareness about. She has invested in several companies named as the biggest corporate polluters in the world.”

This isn’t the first time we’ve been alerted to Madonna’s hypocrisy when it comes to her concerns on the whole global warming crock.  Earlier this year, a video on YouTube shows her riding in a limousine to the airport and then hopping onto a private jet.

Couldn’t the Patriot Act have included a clause on insane-celebrity hypocrites?

Comments

3 Comments so far. Leave a comment below.
  1. This is precisely why the Live Earth concerts are a total joke. I cannot tell you how irritated I am with the whole issue. It’s all just a grab for power. It’s a grab for the very air we breathe. It’s a grab to raise taxes. Ugh. I don’t want my bar-b-ques taxed. I don’t want my big, diesel gussling truck taxed. I don’t want my energy consumption taxed. Ok. I’m going to step off this box before I say something ugly.

  2. Devil Dog,

    Yeah, I agree Jennifer.

    People like Robert Kennedy, Jr. continue to say the debate is over about global warming (mostly because he says it is) due to the fact that meteorologists have extensive results about global warming from for the last 25 years.

    I have a few comments and questions:

    If the meteorologists can look back and tell you the temperature 25 years ago, why are they fairly inaccurate in their predictions of the future?

    Don’t they have a vested interest in continuing the debate? If the issue wasn’t around, they would be relegated to a desk just doing the weather. I think the experts who don’t agree with the “experts” that Robert Kennedy keeps quoting are the true heroes – they are doing it in their self-interest.

    Finally, if we are in a crisis, what starting point are we trying to get back to? What is the norm and who determines the norm? The meteorologists? The government (God help us)? Robert Kennedy or Al Gore (when they can come down from their mountaintops)?

    Thanks.

  3. Devil Dog,

    Sorry, should have said:

    “they are NOT doing it in their self-interest.”

Add Your Comments

Disclaimer
Your email is never published nor shared.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Tips

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title="" rel=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Ready?

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 332 other followers