Wow, I thought this one was put to bed.
This all started just a couple of weeks ago when I posted a humorous reply that Ann Coulter had to Christopher Hitchens. It was not a debate of science, it wasn’t even a serious opposition to the overall theory of atheism. Yes, we all know that Ann Coulter is a believer and does not agree with Darwinism (along with 76% of the country by the way).
For some reason, that very general comment drew the fire of a lot of non-believers which is perfectly fine with me. I am not an enemy of discussion (otherwise I wouldn’t be here.)
In response to those comments and discussion, I posted a second video which featured Bill O’Reilly debating Richard Dawkins. In this video, I proved that even Dawkins (the Atheists’ God) himself cannot prove that it all started without the force of a Creator. When O’Reilly asked him where his proof was, he stated “We’re working on it.”
So, basically we have two men. We have Jesus Christ and we have Richard Dawkins. Jesus Christ professed a belief in God used that belief to stop a prostitute from being stoned to death, probably the only thing that liberals and the ACLU would have endorsed on His behalf.
I then posted different perspectives from very different sources. I also showed how scientists all over the place disagree with one another on the various theories that have been concocted all on the basis that God “probably does not” exist.
While Darwinism has proven itself a totally flawed theory, my argument has always remained the same which is: why should our tax dollars support the theory being taught in public classrooms?
We had some atheists hell-bent on making Christians direct enemies of science. After I pointed that out, another atheist stated the contrary, and finally in this post, I am accused of censoring comments and believing that biology is NOT a natural science.
There is not one quote from me that suggests that. This is just another pathetic attempt for atheists to make science an enemy of religion.
So here we go one more.
1.) Darwinism is a byproduct of Evolution. Christians and believers do not discount Evolution altogether. What they denounce is the idea that we all share a worm.
2.) Darwinism and the crack-pot theories of someone like Richard Dawkins are not true bonafide science in the sense that it is linked to real science like Biology or Natural Sciences!
3.) Dawkins admits that he does not know and claims to be “working on it.” So, we are just supposed to believe in the meantime and err on the side of idiocy that says it all “just happened” — that everything in the galaxy occured without the design of a magnificient being.
4.) 76% of this country agrees with me — if you are an atheist and you are reading this, I am not interested in convincing you! You are the frustrated one because you are the one unable to provide the proof that backs up your idotic assertions (while shamefully using the good name of science to promote that same idiocy.) I’m not here to convince you, and you guys have a lot of work to do if you want to change the mind of 228 million Americans. Good luck.
5.) I do not delete comments. I did; however, in the beginning (you know the Creationist in me) select an automatic setting that automatically blocks postings that contain more than two links as it usually indicates spam. I don’t want my readers clicking on something and getting a virus. But no comments were intentionally deleted.
Now for the love of “God” (literally), quit crying like big sissies everytime someone exposes your extremism. You have the choice to change that by respecting others’ rights to believe and keeping out of our pockets to promote your phony science.