John Who?

ann.jpg  

With the MSM lovemaking-threeway with Hillary and Barack, it’s a little hard to focus on the insanity of the remaining contenders bucking for President next year.  But, as I have enjoyed pointing out how crazy Ron Paul and his supporters are lately, Ann Coulter is our equal opportunity offender when it comes to having a blast with liberals and their political dysfunction.

Ms. Coulter is an inspiration to many – such an inspiration that the most failing Presidential candidates still feel the need to clutch onto her coattails.   

As pointed out by my punctual news-reading site co-author Philip, John Edwards attacked Ann Coulter again.  This was posted by ABC and reported in the most liberally-biased way possible.  But, I won’t rant about that so much.  If you click on the link yourself, you will see that many commenters went on and for the first time in major news-reporting history in terms of the MSM, a vast majority of the readers and commenters are defending Ann Coulter.

Suffice it to say our champ, Ann, is getting bored with John Edwards.  Poor John, Ann Coulter has not even responded to this latest attack.  John called her a “she-devil” just months after Elizabeth Edwards joined up with Hardball host Chris Matthews to lecture the best-selling author on proper political dialogue.  I wonder if Elizabeth lectured John over this one as she did with Ann?

Reading Coulter’s last three columns, we see that she has fun with all liberals:

August 1, 2007

“Noticeably, Gov. Bill Richardson got the first “woo” of the debate — the mating call of rotund liberal women — for demanding a federal mandate that would guarantee public schoolteachers a minimum salary of $40,000.”

August 8, 2007

“But when that clever retort failed to quiet rumblings from the right wing, The New Republic finally revealed the “Baghdad Diarist” to be … John Kerry!”

August 15, 2007

“All the Democrats’ most dearly beloved anti-war/anti-Bush heroes invariably end up in the Teresa Heinz Kerry wing of the nut-house.”

So as we can see, Coulter herself has become quite bored with the Edwardses.  But for some reason, Edwards still feels the need to remind us over and over again of the feud between the two of them.  Could it be that he needs more campaign funding?  Could it be that nobody cares about it? 

This is almost as transparent as famed-9/11 widow Kristen Breitweiser writing a book and responding to Ann Coulter MONTHS after Godless came out. 

It gets interesting when Senators like John Kerry and candidates like John Edwards use the name of Ann Coulter on the Senate floor and during their campaigns to get attention.  If war-opposing crazies who don’t stand a chance for making the Presidency next year are going to use her everytime they run out of PR, could they at least pass the hat around?

How about Ron Paul?  That would be funny!

Comments

10 Comments so far. Leave a comment below.
  1. Philip,

    Ann is just a strawman (woman) for the Edwards campaign at this point. I think that it is truly a sign of desperation from the Edwards camp that they are trying to resurrect this.

    Edwards had to pull his people out of Nevada the other day. That, to me, shows that there is a cash crunch. I guess well find out when the next finance reporting period comes around.

  2. I love how it seemed that most of the comments were defending Ann. It’s about time people pull their heads out.

  3. Shawmut,

    Peace loving liberals, or liberals that wish to be recognized by their lemmings as peace loving, like Kerry and Edwards, need, above all things, enemies. They’ll provoke to get them. Ann Coulter fit’s the bill.
    So interesting, that their raisson’s etres` are predicated upon confrontions that have no solutions.

  4. airforcewife,

    Ann Coulter fills a need for them. They can attack her for using the “f” word about Edwards (which I thought was crude and over the top myself), but be complete hypocrites and ignore the fact that Richardson called someone a “maricon”, which means the same thing but has much worse connotations.

    Hypocrites, much?

  5. Devil Dog,

    Watching the debate today (yawn!), I was struck by the Dems reaction to teachers being paid based on performance.

    They believed that teachers should not be paid based on performance metrics.

    What?

    Everyone in this country, except teachers, are paid based on their performance.

    What would you think if you were a superior teacher and then the guy next to you was crappy, and to top it all off, you both are getting paid the same salary?

    These are the types of questions that someone like Thompson would exploit in a debate.

    Why?

    Because Americans relate to individuals who are slackers. They know the ones at work who seem to be talking about their weekend Monday thru Friday.

    It is about time the teachers are paid just like the rest of us.

  6. AMEN Devil.

    While I have always held high regard for them, I have never felt sorry for a teacher.

    They get summers off. I don’t!

    They get huge retirements based on invested money of all taxpayers. I don’t!

    The insanity alone is worth pointing out. But what I hate the most — and I am sorry to be so crass — is the hypersensitivity people have in regard to teachers nowadays.

    Everything you said and myself as well could be deemed offensive.

    We are more concerned with the feelings and political correctness in speaking of teachers than we are about our own military.

    How about they get paid a required $40K per year?

  7. Devil Dog,

    Well, I agree with you Steve and I think that teachers are just that job position that is taboo and you are labeled against education if you say anything bad about teachers.

    It is non-sense!

  8. Philip,

    Sounds like we need a good post on teachers’ unions now.

  9. Dave,

    Ann has been a major source of revenue for the Edwards campain. They should be cutting her a commission check.

    However, Edwards is a loser and he’s going no where fast!

  10. I know she actually responded to it tonight on H&C.

    She laughed it off for the most part.

Add Your Comments

Disclaimer
Your email is never published nor shared.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Tips

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title="" rel=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Ready?

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 332 other followers