September 2007
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
« Aug   Oct »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930

Month September 2007

Viva La France!

You could historically count me as one of the top France-bashers around.  During the administrations of Francois Mitterand and Jacques Chirac, I was completely disillusioned with the cowardly, antagonistic nation that seemed bent on making itself completely irrelevant in the international community.  Under these two jokers, France’s prime directive was to assault US interests and policies at every turn.  They were not even Euro-centric.  These doofs were unabashed Francophiles who could care less about matters beyond their own borders.

Then came Nicolas Sarkozy.

He is a wet dream for Americans compared to his repugnant predecessors.  He made it clear during his campaign for the presidency that he was focused on improving ties with America.  He reflected on his time spent in the US and his admiration of the American resolve.  Upon his election, he began to translate all of that into reality.  He promptly took his first vacation in the US and took time to meet with GW in Kennebunkport.

Think that has made him a lot of friends in Europe?  Oh, hell no.  While the honeymoon with voters in France has been relatively quaint, his perception among the socialist intelligentsia across the European continent has been rocky.  I guess that would explain this article from London’s Financial Times.  I read this article as a veiled indictment of Sarkozy for his attempts to nurture a relationship with the US.  At the very least, it gives voice to the frustration felt amongst European leaders.

Since becoming France’s president in May, Mr Sarkozy has been making some of his most startling statements in the realm of foreign policy and appears to have ripped up the rhetorical handbook handed down by previous French presidents. In particular, he has appalled the clerics of France’s cult of anti-Americanism by lavishing praise on the US.

During the presidential election campaign, Mr Sarkozy was taunted by one of his Socialist opponents as “an American neocon with a French passport”. This particular critic was subsequently co-opted by Mr Sarkozy and now sits in his cabinet. But judging by Mr Sarkozy’s recent hardline speeches on Iran, the original comment does not appear too far wide of the mark. Mr Sarkozy was the first leader to talk openly of the possibility of war with Iran and is now pressing for tougher sanctions.

Mr Sarkozy appears to have an instinctive admiration for the dynamism and mobility of US society. As the son of a Hungarian immigrant who has risen to the highest office in the land, Mr Sarkozy has been living the American dream in France. But Mr Sarkozy’s rapprochement with Washington probably also springs from hard-headed calculation: the need to count in Washington if he is to matter in the rest of the world. As one European diplomat says: “Sarkozy is someone who wants to make things happen. He is a doer, a deal-maker and a pragmatist. But that means he has to get on with the big boys rather than messing around with a lot of grand – and ultimately meaningless – rhetoric.”

The subtle commentary underlying this article is that Sarkozy is a self-absorbed politician who has befriended America in order to further his own interests.

As Daniel Cohn-Bendit, a European parliamentarian, recently told French radio: “The Sarkozy style is very French, very king of France, emperor of France. It is I who does everything, it is I who thinks everything, who is everything. It is me, me, me at the European level and that irritates people because it’s not true.”

I suppose President Sarkozy’s choice to engage the US as a friend brings with it serious risk.  The European elite will continue to paint this as basically American ass-kissing.  I view it as a good first step at repairing the damage done by successive French administrations who were more interested in themselves than developing meaningful relationships.  The previous French regimes were dedicated to furthering their own narcissistic agendas rather than making a true difference in the international community.

Nicolas Sarkozy will not always see eye-to-eye with the US.  There will be significant points of disagreement.  But at least we have, in Sarkozy, a partner we can deal with in a positive way.  Europe can moan and wail as loudly as it wants, but as long as Sarkozy is in office, you can bet that France will be a more meaningful player on the world stage.

Free Burma!

No, this isn’t a protest from the greens of my liberal-as-hell alma mater.  This is a shout from a conservative guy in the tradition of Rep. Christopher Smith, a strong crusader for human rights across the globe.  It’s time to see Burma returned to the fold of democratic nations and out the grips of its current military dictatorship.

Over the next few weeks, you will hear a lot about the events in Burma.  The media will call it Myanmar.  That is the name that the brutal military junta has bestowed upon this ancient nation.  The Bush administration has rebuked this renaming – refering to this proud nation by its traditional name – Burma.

Already, the junta has quashed protesters led by Buddhist monks who are calling for change.  The protests where prompted by the government’s mandate that increased fuel prices by 300%.  Regardless of the cause, the move stoked the flames of resentment against the Orwellian reign of the junta.

The reports from the government fail to capture the true extent of the military’s crack down on protesters.

The government claims 10 people have been killed since the violence began earlier this week, but diplomats say the toll is likely much higher. Dissident groups have put the number as high as 200.

The international community has risen up in outrage.  Buddhist monks have been savaged.  A curfew was implemented so that citizens of Burma would not be witness to the atrocities committed against the monks.

The Bush administration has instituted new sanctions against 14 leaders associated with the junta in Burma.  It is my hope that other nations will follow suit.  The people of Burma have lived for too long under the oppressive regime that inflicts the nation.  The rightful government of the National League of Democracy Party should have control of the nation.  Unfortunately, they were denied their victory in 1990 by the junta.  It’s time for democracy to take place in Burma.  It’s time for the military dictatorship to step aside and for their leaders to be tried in international courts for crimes against humanity.

Thank God that Bush and his administration have taken strong steps to support the people of Burma.  I stand behind the protesters.  I pray that their efforts will not be in vain.  I pray that the deaths of the monks and citizens who are crying out for freedom will be avenged.

Not In Our Backyard!

iran-venezuelax-large.jpg

Does this photo sicken anyone else?  I’m waiting for the person that confronts me over my Iran fetish.  I think too few realize the danger of the regime in Tehran.  The fact that they are reaching out to dictators in our own hemisphere is frightening.  Score this one for the need to put a Republican in the White House in 2008.  I’m not too certain that W won’t do something before he leaves office.  If he does – more power.

Ahmadinejad has pledged $1 billion to the leftist nutjob, Evo Morales, in Bolivia.  Morales is a Hugo Chavez wanna-be.  He is praying to become one of the unholy Iran ass-kissers in South America as is the Ecuadorean President Rafael Correa.  Apparently, Congress believes that we can combat this by pouring more money into the suspect nations in Latin America.

 The closer ties are viewed with alarm by the opposition in Venezuela and Bolivia, and by Washington. U.S. Rep. Connie Mack, a Florida Republican, said they remind him “of the relationship that Fidel Castro had with Russia.” He urged Washington to reach out more to a region analysts say it has largely ignored since 9-11.

Toward that aim, a bipartisan bill is being introduced in the U.S. Congress on Friday that would establish a 10-year, $2.5 billion program aimed at reducing poverty and expanding the middle class in Latin America. It would require recipient countries to contribute and encourage matching funds from businesses and non-governmental organizations.

The program would bring more stability in the long run and help the United States “re-establish leadership in the hemisphere” by increasing development assistance by more than a third, said bill co-sponsor Sen. Bob Menendez, a New Jersey Democrat.

I’m all about helping the people in Latin America.  Strong democratic nations in our own hemisphere are a plus for Americans.  But I have a better idea that will nip this bullshit in the bud.  Get rid of the mullahs.  Without Iran, we have little to worry about.  Chavez is a pathetic little man.  With some CIA intervention, he will soon be a sad afterthought.  Then the silly little thugs like Morales and Correa will fade away.

Ever hear of the Monroe Doctrine folks?  We don’t need this crap in our part of the world.  When the Soviets started to arm Cuba with nukes, JFK threatened to push the nuclear button.  Similarly, we need to take swift action against Iran soon.  Iran has already gone too far.  It isn’t enough that they are attempting to assert their dominance in the Middle East.  They want Iranian hegemony in our Hemisphere.  It’s time to take out the garbage.

I promise you this – hell is about to break loose.  W. will not leave office without dealing with these nutjobs, and I will support him.  And I pray that the next President of the United States will place Hugo in their sites as soon as we finish dealing with the Persian joke.

 

My 2008 GOP Endorsement Goes To…..

No one. 

That’s right. I will not publicly endorse any of the contenders for the 2008 GOP presidential nomination.  Don’t get me wrong.  They are all worthy contenders (mostly).  I have just decided that 2008 is too important to me. If I endorse one candidate, I do so at the risk of alienating another.  Given the prospect of President Clinton Part II, I will demur when it comes to any formal endorsements.

The GOP’s 11th Commandment is “Thou shalt not speak ill of another Republican.”  Ronald Reagan is often cited as the source of the 11th Commandment.  In fact, it was the former California state GOP Chairman, Gaylord Parkinson, who conceived of the rule in 1966 during Reagan’s run for Governor of California.  Parkinson was motivated by the events a few years earlier that plagued the GOP during Barry Goldwater’s presidential run against LBJ.  Liberal Republicans, disenchanted with Goldwater’s conservatism, gave fodder to the Democrats with their words and condemnations of Barry.  Parkinson was convinced that the Democrats needed no such assistance from within the party during an election.

Reagan owned the Commandment to the extent that he embraced it and made it an integral part of his political life from that point forward.  The Gipper won respect from Republicans of all strains due to his refusal to pound away at fellow Republicans during campaign season.

I would be an utter hypocrite, if I described myself as a strict adherent to this commandment.  I have always described myself as a conservative first and a Republican second.  I believe that distinction is more relevant today than it was even a decade ago.  I have freely chastized Republicans such as Chuck Hagel, Olympia Snowe, Arlen Spector and others who have, at times, abandoned basic Republican principles.  You could argue that these folks have often violated the 11th Commandment themselves by casting doubt on other Republicans.  I won’t use this opportunity to debate whether it is appropriate to denouce Republicans who denouce Republicans.

For the 2008 GOP primary, however, I am willing to call a truce. I have made some remarks about current contenders in the past.  But as the threat of a Dem in the White House grows, I am willing to hold my tongue. As I survey the field of GOP candidates, I see no one (except Ron Paul who is a Libertarian, not a Republican) that should raise the ire of conservatives to the point that they should allow Hillary, Obama or Little John to take up residence at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.  The issues at stake for 2008 are too critical.  This is no time to protest the details when we are faced with bigger threats.

I am calling on all fellow Republicans to embrace the 11th Commandment.  I cannot promise that I will not speak my mind in other races, but the White House must remain in the hands of a person that will stand strong and act against the forces of terror that threaten the very security of our nation.  I am satisfied that any of our candidates (except Paul) will do that.

I will have my favorite candidate.  I can honestly say that I have narrowed the field.  But most of you won’t know who I will vote for when I walk into the voting booth for the Texas GOP Primary election.  Why should it matter who I endorse?  When November 2008 rolls around, I will vote for the candidate with the (R) beside his name.  To that extent, my favorite is irrelevant.

I commend Steve and others who have active roles in the primaries.  Their advocacy is part of the job. And I don’t want anyone to believe that my stance in unprincipled or wishy-washy.  This public neutrality will be a first for me.  But I fully believe that 2008 is an exceptional year with important ramifications.

In the meantime, I will implore my fellow conservative bloggers to avoid personally bashing any of the GOP contenders.  There is too much at stake for us to allow a Democrat to be elected.  I hope that, in the end, we will all be able to unite around the Republican candidate for President.

Another Pledge Fiasco

Fresh from Bouler, Colorado -

About 50 Boulder High School students walked out of class Thursday to protest the daily reading of the Pledge of Allegiance and recited their own version, omitting “one nation, under God.”

The students say the phrase violates the constitutional separation of church and state.

They also say the daily reading of the pledge over the school public address system at the start of the second class takes away from education time and is ignored or mocked by some students.

Good grief.  Here we go again.  Considering that the group who sponsored the move, The Student Worker Club, has only a dozen members, I would be willing to bet that several of the students were apathetic idiots who walked out to avoid class.  Of course that is pure conjecture on my part.  I suppose that it is entirely possible that all 50 students were actually highly unprincipled cynics who actually believe the garbage spewed by the group’s president.

“Boulder High has a highly diverse population, not all of whom believe in God, or one God,” said Emma Martens, a senior and president of the club, which has about a dozen members.

“We didn’t think it was fair for the whole school to have to listen to it. It’s almost religious oppression,” she said.

Of course, I’m more bewildered by the statement that came from the high school’s principal -

Principal Bud Jenkins told the Camera newspaper on its Web site Thursday the pledge will not be moved, but added he was proud of the students for standing up for their beliefs.

I guess it’s all just hopeless.  People consistently amaze me.  And the whack jobs just keep getting younger and younger. 

/**/

Fed Up With Dr. James

Dr. James Dobson, founder of Focus on the Family, is using his perceived clout with Christian conservatives to submarine the presidential hopes of several GOP aspirants.  He has notably poo-poo’d Rudy Giuliani, and now he has Fred Thompson squarely in his site.  Dobson is notable for his proclamation in March that Thompson, baptized into the Church of Christ, was not a true Christian.  Dobson apparently has special access to the Book of Life and a direct line to God himself.

Now comes the news that Dobson, in a personal email, challenged Thompson’s conviction to conservative positions and his desire to run. 

“Isn’t Thompson the candidate who is opposed to a Constitutional amendment to protect marriage, believes there should be 50 different definitions of marriage in the U.S., favors McCain-Feingold, won’t talk at all about what he believes, and can’t speak his way out of a paper bag on the campaign trail?” Dobson wrote.

“He has no passion, no zeal, and no apparent ‘want to.’ And yet he is apparently the Great Hope that burns in the breasts of many conservative Christians? Well, not for me, my brothers. Not for me!”

What Dobson fails to mention is that Fred Thompson believes that marriage, like abortion, is a matter that should be left to the discretion of the states.  A strong supporter of states’ rights, Fred firmly believes that, on many levels, the Federal government has overstepped its jurisdiction in matters that should be left to the states (read – the 10th Amendment to the Constitution).

Dobson and other Christian conservatives support an amendment to the U.S. Constitution that would bar gay marriage nationally. Thompson has said he would support a constitutional amendment that would prohibit states from imposing their gay marriage laws on other states, which falls well short of that.

Karen Hanretty, a spokeswoman for the Thompson campaign, said Wednesday in response to the Dobson e-mail: “Fred Thompson has a 100 percent pro-life voting record. He believes strongly in returning authority to the levels of government closest to families and communities, protecting states from intrusion by the federal government and activist judges.

I find it ironic that Dobson sees himself as a conservative when a true conservative is one who upholds the rights of states against the encroachment of an overbearing federal government.  Obviously, Dobson believes in that tenet only to the extent it doesn’t interfere with his agenda.  While I disagree with Thompson on his past support of McCain-Feingold, I have found Fred to be a solid conservative on most other positions near and dear to my heart.

I said it in March, and I’ll repeat my indictment against Dobson again.  Dr. James fancies himself a kingmaker in the GOP.  He wishes to have MoveOn.org-like power in order to affect GOP politics to his own benefit.  I often wonder how much of his rhetoric is based on principle and how much of it is based on his need to prop up his stature among his perceived power base.

This is not a slap at Christians (why would I slap my own personal beliefs?)  And, further, it is not a slap at evangelical Christians.  The evangelical movement is an integral part of the GOP’s base and underlying philosophy – the philosophy that embraces Judeo-Christian values.  This indictment is simply a reflection on James Dobson himself.  Dobson is to the evangelical movement what Jesse Jackson is to the civil rights movement – an outdated blowhard using his position for his own narcissitic purposes.

Again, I’ll call for Dr. Dobson to butt out if he has nothing constructive to add.  Large numbers of evangelicals and their leaders have already embraced Thompson, Giuliani and Romney based on their own principles and a lot of homework.  Dobson is merely an odd-man-out.  And I wish he would stay out.

Hillary-Care Back Again

Mark Davis is our resident conservative talk show host here in the Dallas-Fort Worth area.  He’s also a columnist for the Dallas Morning News.  He has recently delved into Hillary’s new (old?) plan to force socialized health care onto the American people.  His latest article in the DMN echoes his statements on his talk show about the futility and deceptiveness of her plan.

In 1993 and today, she pays lip service to American health care, calling it the best in the world. In the same breath, she still proposes meddling in ways that can only denigrate that quality.

Her zeal is based on one of the great myths of modern times, the mistaken belief that we have a health care “crisis.”

To be sure, some people face monstrous health care costs without the safety net of insurance to protect them, but most of the 47 million Americans who lack health insurance have bypassed it by choice. Plenty of healthy young people and couples choose to forgo premiums to free up money for other things.

We can consider that a dangerous gamble, but it does not constitute some blight of victimization requiring a government solution.

Anyone may reasonably observe that the U.S. health care system has problems. But most of those problems rest in how health care is paid for, and none of those ills get better with layers of new federal obligations.

Democrats and liberals seem anxious to make the US health care system coincide with that of Canada and many European nations.  Hillary should have learned her lesson in 1993, but she obviously learned little.  Of course, that might be a misstatement.

In 1993, Hillary’s plan was backed by a document in excess of 1000 pages explaining the intricacies of her socialist vision.  Her latest “American Health Choices Plan” is little more than 10 pages of vague rubbish that outlines her concept without providing details.  Pressed for those details, Hillary simply asserts that the details will be negotiated with Congress.  Is that supposed to make me feel better?

She vastly underestimates the yearly cost of the plan at $110 billion.  You do the math in your head and see if that works out.  Furthermore, do you believe Congress could hold the costs down to that level?  Consider the fraud and inefficiencies in Medicaid and Medicare and tell me if you believe that any level of government can efficiently manage something as complicated as health care.  I think not.

Then consider that she would expect all people to buy into the system regardless of their desire to do so.  How is that a “choice?”  If I make $20 million a year and don’t wish to buy into this farce, why should I have to?  She even threatens the American worker by stating that the system might be enforced by denying a job applicant employment unless he or she is fully insured.  “Sorry you are fully qualified for this position, but we can’t hire you because you don’t have the federally-mandated insurance.”  What a ruse!

Hillary keeps the details of her plan hidden because she doesn’t want to the invite the discussion and inevitable opposition that will come with it.  She actually did learn from 1993.  The question is – have we?  If Americans buy into this trickery, we would be faced with the same sorry health care system that recently forced a Canadian MP to come to the US for breast cancer treatment.  Health care will be rationed, doctors will be few and far between, and the quality of our health care innovation will suffer dramatically.

Never have the stakes been higher in a presidential election.  From Iraq to health care, the stakes are raised each and every day.  You can be sure that, if Hillary is elected, conservatives will be forced to devote all of their political resources to combatting this type of insanity rather than focusing on legislation that will actually benefit the American people.

Whose Conspiracy Was This? Murdoch Ties Soros in Richest Americans Issue

soros.jpgmurdoch.jpgSoros(L) & Murdoch (R)

This was strange to say the least.  Being an accountant and all, sometimes headlines about money catch my attention.

In Forbes “400 Richest” Americans list that was published recently, George Soros ties Rupert Murdoch for the #33 position.

So, the next time you hear some whining liberal complain about how the rich, powerful, and evil Rupert Murdoch, maybe we can offer them an even trade?

33. Rupert Murdoch, 76, $8.8 billion, New York, News Corp.

33. George Soros, 77, $8.8 billion, Westchester, N.Y., hedge funds

To add to the humor, I have to say that I looked all over for the names “Rice”, “Cheney”, or “Bush” for all of the folks allegedly getting rich off of the war in Iraq, they didn’t seem to make the top 400, though.

Good News From Nebraska

Current Agriculture Secretary, Mike Johanns, announced today that he was resigning his post to focus on the 2008 GOP nomination for the Senate seat in Nebraska that is being vacated by pseudo-Republican, Chuck Hagel.  And while the seat wouldn’t represent a GOP gain in 2008, it would be a good thing to know that it is being occupied by someone who wasn’t an antagonistic pretender (like Hagel) or, even worse, a Democrat.

Hagel has made a name for himself recently as an anti-war Republican who was flirting with an independent run for the presidency in 2008.  In announcing his retirement, Hagel also ruled out the presidential bid.  Johanns’ announcement is particularly reassuring given reports that former Senator Bob Kerry (not to be confused with 3-Purple-Hearts-John) is seriously considering entering the race.

A popular former Nebraska governor, Johanss may well be the only Republican with enough star power in the state to stave off a win by Kerry.  Other Republicans have declared for the seat or are contemplating doing so, but Johanns possibly respresents the GOP’s best bet to retain the seat against Kerry.

I have researched Johann’s record and found him to definitely be right of center (with a few hitches).  Regardless of his overall positions on each issue, he will certainly be a welcomed reprieve from the current holder of that Senate seat. President Bush will likely miss him at the White House, but I’ll be happy to have him in the race for 2008.

See Liberals, Terrorists Really Do Hate You!

madonnabritney.jpg

As if poor Britney did not have enough trouble, a Muslim Extremist leader has threatened to behead both Britney and Madonna.  Well, there would go 90% of what makes the gay community wake up in the morning!  Finally, maybe they’ll be willing to fight.

Madonna, in particular has been especially vocal in her opposition against George Bush.  The terrorists know that she is against George Bush.  Doesn’t this debunk the Ron Paul arguments that if we just leave them alone, they will stop? 

Low and behold the terrorist’s name is “Muhammed.”  Why do I get the strange feeling that Madonna and her liberal (especially the gay ones) fans will finally begin to support profiling?

Mainly in response to Madonna and her Kaballah-reading, he says the following about both women:

“If I meet these whores I will have the honour to be the first one to cut their heads off if they will keep spreading their satanic culture against Islam”

There you have it liberals.  There you have it, Ron Paul!  If you believe in freedom, no matter how vulgar, you need to be converted to Islam, or you must die.

I wonder why this hasn’t made headlines?

Read more here.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 172 other followers