<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I&#8217;m Going There</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gayconservative.org/2008/06/01/im-going-there/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gayconservative.org/2008/06/01/im-going-there/</link>
	<description>Resource for Gay Conservatives</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 16:34:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donovan Walters</title>
		<link>http://gayconservative.org/2008/06/01/im-going-there/#comment-5079</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Donovan Walters]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 17:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveflesher.wordpress.com/?p=446#comment-5079</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[hi
8xtqph5bauhgmgv4
good luck]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi<br />
8xtqph5bauhgmgv4<br />
good luck</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wide ribbon edging sewing</title>
		<link>http://gayconservative.org/2008/06/01/im-going-there/#comment-4322</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wide ribbon edging sewing]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 13:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveflesher.wordpress.com/?p=446#comment-4322</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[uztelba]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>uztelba</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: veterinarians that come to the home</title>
		<link>http://gayconservative.org/2008/06/01/im-going-there/#comment-3359</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[veterinarians that come to the home]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveflesher.wordpress.com/?p=446#comment-3359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ntyvhl]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ntyvhl</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: antivirus</title>
		<link>http://gayconservative.org/2008/06/01/im-going-there/#comment-3354</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[antivirus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:12:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveflesher.wordpress.com/?p=446#comment-3354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[mtse swpt xnetp]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mtse swpt xnetp</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: minimum wage stuck lyrics</title>
		<link>http://gayconservative.org/2008/06/01/im-going-there/#comment-3321</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[minimum wage stuck lyrics]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 23:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveflesher.wordpress.com/?p=446#comment-3321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[dmijwfg umyb atuy]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dmijwfg umyb atuy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ashley harkleroad pics</title>
		<link>http://gayconservative.org/2008/06/01/im-going-there/#comment-3318</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ashley harkleroad pics]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 22:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveflesher.wordpress.com/?p=446#comment-3318</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[dqrgye dwioae]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dqrgye dwioae</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John in CA</title>
		<link>http://gayconservative.org/2008/06/01/im-going-there/#comment-3317</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John in CA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 15:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveflesher.wordpress.com/?p=446#comment-3317</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am not confident enough in the gay community as a whole to say that this is right. I am only confident in them.

&quot;They met, developed a relationship, and spent years building a solid and stable life together. 

How many people in the gay community can we say have done that? &quot;

So gay people should jump a few more hurdles before having children?   Everyone else can go for it at will?

Your two friends with the two daughters sound to me like a model couple for any couple wishing to have children period.   

I know two men who went from first date, to committment ceremony to first child born in 3 years!!!  Can you say warp speed?   

They are nice guys if you don&#039;t mind having a baby raised by two Mr. Spocks.   I can&#039;t picture a child growing up in a home with no laughter, emotion or with two parents who both lack a  sense of humor.   Yuck!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not confident enough in the gay community as a whole to say that this is right. I am only confident in them.</p>
<p>&#8220;They met, developed a relationship, and spent years building a solid and stable life together. </p>
<p>How many people in the gay community can we say have done that? &#8221;</p>
<p>So gay people should jump a few more hurdles before having children?   Everyone else can go for it at will?</p>
<p>Your two friends with the two daughters sound to me like a model couple for any couple wishing to have children period.   </p>
<p>I know two men who went from first date, to committment ceremony to first child born in 3 years!!!  Can you say warp speed?   </p>
<p>They are nice guys if you don&#8217;t mind having a baby raised by two Mr. Spocks.   I can&#8217;t picture a child growing up in a home with no laughter, emotion or with two parents who both lack a  sense of humor.   Yuck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: letterstoadyingdream</title>
		<link>http://gayconservative.org/2008/06/01/im-going-there/#comment-3177</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[letterstoadyingdream]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 18:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveflesher.wordpress.com/?p=446#comment-3177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John you just want to open up another can of worms, this debate could go on forever.  If you are talking about nature vs. nurture I would say that both would contribute it is just what percentage of each that could be debated, and it might have to case by case.  

I would say &quot;multiple partners&quot; would be mostly personal choice but you can rule out that man&#039;s inherent instinct to pass on his genes as with any animal as some part of it.  Like the old joke about it takes a woman to domesticate a man. However due to mans higher brain function then most animals (unless we are talking about hippies) I think how someone was raised would have most impact.  Self control, personal morals, societal pressure, and such.  

I&#039;m still going to go with the Aliens it&#039;s all their fault.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John you just want to open up another can of worms, this debate could go on forever.  If you are talking about nature vs. nurture I would say that both would contribute it is just what percentage of each that could be debated, and it might have to case by case.  </p>
<p>I would say &#8220;multiple partners&#8221; would be mostly personal choice but you can rule out that man&#8217;s inherent instinct to pass on his genes as with any animal as some part of it.  Like the old joke about it takes a woman to domesticate a man. However due to mans higher brain function then most animals (unless we are talking about hippies) I think how someone was raised would have most impact.  Self control, personal morals, societal pressure, and such.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m still going to go with the Aliens it&#8217;s all their fault.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John in CA</title>
		<link>http://gayconservative.org/2008/06/01/im-going-there/#comment-3176</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John in CA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 17:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveflesher.wordpress.com/?p=446#comment-3176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Interesting argument, but I don’t buy it. That a species genes would feel the need to evolve it’s own form of population control when usually evolution -in the survival of the fittest kind- is that the genes and traits necessary or most supportive of life are the ones to dominate and be passed on. &quot;

I consider the population control aspect a normal variant on the genetic roulette.   By no means is it a dominant factor in any species.  

As for traits being lost over time there is one thing about that among gay men that I find interesting.

Some gay men like to have sex with multiple partners.   Some do not.   

Two men together won&#039;t produce an offspring.  They aren&#039;t built to do that.   

So, why the need to have sex with as many partners as one wants?   Is this a personal choice?  Is this behavior shaped by what someone learns as a child or teen?   Is this something driven by evolution?   

You would think with gay men the desire to have multiple partners would have died out generations ago.   Why?    There is no way to pass on genetic traits if a guy sticks with guys only.  I am not dissing sex with multiple partners.  To each their own I say.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Interesting argument, but I don’t buy it. That a species genes would feel the need to evolve it’s own form of population control when usually evolution -in the survival of the fittest kind- is that the genes and traits necessary or most supportive of life are the ones to dominate and be passed on. &#8221;</p>
<p>I consider the population control aspect a normal variant on the genetic roulette.   By no means is it a dominant factor in any species.  </p>
<p>As for traits being lost over time there is one thing about that among gay men that I find interesting.</p>
<p>Some gay men like to have sex with multiple partners.   Some do not.   </p>
<p>Two men together won&#8217;t produce an offspring.  They aren&#8217;t built to do that.   </p>
<p>So, why the need to have sex with as many partners as one wants?   Is this a personal choice?  Is this behavior shaped by what someone learns as a child or teen?   Is this something driven by evolution?   </p>
<p>You would think with gay men the desire to have multiple partners would have died out generations ago.   Why?    There is no way to pass on genetic traits if a guy sticks with guys only.  I am not dissing sex with multiple partners.  To each their own I say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: letterstoadyingdream</title>
		<link>http://gayconservative.org/2008/06/01/im-going-there/#comment-3148</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[letterstoadyingdream]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 00:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steveflesher.wordpress.com/?p=446#comment-3148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;I see it as a way to prevent potential overpopulation. If 10 percent of a life form is gay, then taht 10 percent won’t reproduce all things being equal. When that is extrapolated over the generations the impact is significant.&quot;

Interesting argument, but I don&#039;t buy it.  That a species genes would feel the need to evolve it&#039;s own form of population control when usually evolution -in the survival of the fittest kind- is that the genes and traits necessary or most supportive of life are the ones to dominate and be passed on.  Even if it was several different genes and they were all recessive it would stand to reason that eventually they would be lost over time.  While this could only work for humans you could argue that societal pressures to conform to heterosexuality have allowed these genes to survive though.  

I bet the real answer has something to do with aliens.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I see it as a way to prevent potential overpopulation. If 10 percent of a life form is gay, then taht 10 percent won’t reproduce all things being equal. When that is extrapolated over the generations the impact is significant.&#8221;</p>
<p>Interesting argument, but I don&#8217;t buy it.  That a species genes would feel the need to evolve it&#8217;s own form of population control when usually evolution -in the survival of the fittest kind- is that the genes and traits necessary or most supportive of life are the ones to dominate and be passed on.  Even if it was several different genes and they were all recessive it would stand to reason that eventually they would be lost over time.  While this could only work for humans you could argue that societal pressures to conform to heterosexuality have allowed these genes to survive though.  </p>
<p>I bet the real answer has something to do with aliens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

