August 2008
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
« Jul   Sep »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Month August 2008

Entries 10 Total

Nazi America, Part II

Aug 31, 08 5:26 PM

I’m going to expand on an earlier blog I wrote about a year ago.  Back then, I wrote about Democrat shenanigans led by Nancy Pelosi that hijacked a fair vote to change the outcome that Miss Speaker didn’t like.  She was never called to answer for her heavy-handed tactics.  The same type of thing is still going on, but it’s only getting worse.

I saw a bumper sticker during my morning commute that said “Arrest…Impeach…Hand Over to the Hague.”  It refers to the view that George W Bush is guilty of war crimes and should be tried.  It’s very popular for the far-left liberal anti-war crowd to compare Bush to Adolf Hitler.  I can understand not being happy with the state of things; you can never make the entire populace happy.  But calling Bush the next Hitler has become so popular that I’m thoroughly nauseated.  I might be very irritated with the man, but he’s definitely NOT Hitler.

Liberals love the comparison for the same reason pro-illegal immigrants love the word racist: they think it’ll scare everyone into giving them what they want.  They complain that we’re losing our freedoms because of the Patriot Act.  I have a question for you…ever hear of a group called ACORN?

It’s an acronym for Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now.  Sounds harmless.  They say they’re the largest advocacy group for moderate and low-income families, but they’re also involved in voter registration.  For years, there have been accusations of voter fraud, and now the Justice Department is finally investigating with solid evidence of fraud.  ACORN was caught sending letters to people all over the country in a “voter registration drive.”  But the letters were sent to all kinds of people and they were worded in such a way that those who received the letters who were already registered voters believed they had lost their voting privelege.  Most recently, a group of seven ACORN volunteers were caught submitting fraudulent voter registration cards; four of this single group were caught submitting numerous cards for people who were already registered to vote (who had no idea they were being submitted again), and others were caught literally making up identities for illegal aliens.  It’s unknown how many fraud voter applications ACORN has submitted.  Barack Obama has funnelled thousands upon thousands of dollars to this organization.

It gets better.  A group called the American Issues Project has put out an ad pointing out the relationship between Obama and Weather Underground terrorist Bill Ayers.  Ayers helped the Weathermen bomb a police statue in Philadelphia twice (it was rebuilt after the first bombing and they bombed it again within days), openly called for killing conservative politicians, started riots, and bombed the US Capitol building in 1972.  To avoid capture he hid until the statute of limitations ran out, then resurfaced as a college professor.  After 9/11, he told the New York Times of his crimes, “we didn’t do enough.”  AIP brought all of this out in a sixty-second ad.  Obama has written several strongly-worded letters demanding that the American Issues Project be investigated for the ad.  What for?  Every word is true.  AIP has done nothing more than exercise their First Amendment rights.  The problem is that the Democrats don’t want to face the truth.

Now, we have this–an ABC reporter being roughed up by police:

Hang on to your pants, ’cause this happened right here in the USA.  The reporter was outside an upper-crust hotel housing the high-dollar Democrats and their sponsors at the Democratic National Convention in Denver.

Talk about Nazism.  It is alive, but not where the liberals would have us all believe.

Comments (3)

Hot Damn!

Aug 29, 08 5:05 PM

 

Ok.  I’m done.  Out of seclusion now.  I’m going to follow up on Mel.  Wow…..what a pick by John McCain.  I could have thought of a couple of others besides Sarah Palin (including my Kay Bay), but WOW!  She is a little soft when it comes to experience (so is Obama), but what a great choice.

I’m nervous about how she will fare in the debate versus Biden, but Sarah is a solid, fantastic person who will energize conservatives.  I have followed her for a while.  And I am impressed.  The leftist pundits are out on the attack now, but I feel good about this one.  She is pro-life, pro-gun and she doesn’t mess around.  She is solid as they come based on my research.

Go John!  I’m a happy boy right now.

 

PS:  I’m back folks!

Comments (10)

Change We Can REALLY Believe In

Aug 29, 08 2:17 PM

The news has just broken that John McCain has chosen Alaska governor Sarah Palin as his VP pick.  Can I get a holla-holla?

I’m so happy right now I could just dance (which is saying a lot, since both a) I don’t dance, and b) I’m sick as a damn dog at the moment).  Palin was the first female governor of Alaska, and she’s made her presence known in very short order.  She’s best known for stopping the pork-barrel “bridge to nowhere” project, which would have built a bridge bigger than the Golden Gate and Brooklyn bridges from Ketchikan International Airport to tiny Gravina Island–cutting across a major maritime thoroughfare.  She has passed major ethics reform bills, and in a bold, un-GOP-like move used the power of her veto to strike down a bill that would have stopped giving benefits to gay employees of the state and their partners.

Palin is also a member of the National Rifle Association (woot!), has a downs syndrome child, and another who is a soldier in the US Army (hooah!).  So to all you “Farenheit 9/11″ followers…listen up, our politicians DO have the guts to allow their kids to fight.  Her husband is part Eskimo and has won the Tesoro Iron Dog (the biggest snowmobile race in the world) four times. 

What’s best is that she defies her critics to hold her accountable.  When threats came down the wire about a legislative investigation into claims that she tried to have her sister’s ex-husband fired from his job as a state trooper, she willingly handed over all of the information that was needed and told the critics who jumped up and down with glee to have at her–she had nothing to hide.  She continues to do what no politician will, and has brought Republicans and Democrats together in her quest to hold the oil companies in Alaska accountable.  She’s actually found a way to tax those companies without passing the charge on to consumers, and Alaska’s finances are doing incredibly well.

What’s absolutely galling to me is that Senator Chuck Schumer actually said that her “lack of experience makes the thought of her assuming the Presidency troubling.”  Yep.  I wonder if Barack Obama’s much younger and even less experienced appointment is troubling to him.  As Michelle Malkin would say, “Gaffe-tastic!”

Comments (6)

“It WAS A Missile! I SAW It!”

Aug 27, 08 12:38 PM

Trouble is, nobody has come forward to say such a thing.  Here’s another twoofer video claiming “proof” that it wasn’t a plane:

How is this proof, you ask?  Well, the poster, nineelevennews, states that this video proves that the witness who claimed to have seen the passenger’s faces in the plane that hit the Pentagon had to have been lying.  In this video, you can’t even see the windows on the plane.  In the description, the poster claims this as evidence that ALL of the witnesses were lying about what they saw.  Since only one witness claims to have seen the passenger’s faces, I fail to see how this video would discredit all of them.

After the murder of Philadelphia police officer Danny Faulkner, defense attorneys have attempted to discredit evidence against the murderer, Mumia Abu Jamal, by pointing out a “witness” to the crime.  William Singletary, a Vietnam vet and “local businessman,” has stated that he saw Mumia attempt to help Faulkner.  But Singletary said a lot of things that were false.  He swore up and down that Mumia wore a turban (he didn’t, he had dreadlocks), there was a police helicopter circling the area (Philly PD didn’t even own one until years after the shooting), Faulkner was shot in the face (impressive since Faulkner turned and shot Mumia as he was falling to the ground), and that he called for his children (Faulkner had no children).  All of this after he told officers on the scene that he hadn’t seen anything.

Yes, it is entirely possible for a “witness” to lie.  But is it not also possible that, in the case of the above video, the camera can’t focus the way the human eye can?  Man has yet to invent any camera that can capture the images the human eye is capable of.  We can see in darkness; cameras cannot.  We can focus on something distinct in an image or scene; a camera cannot.  It is possible that the witness lied, but it is also entirely possible that they did, in fact, focus on a few faces as the plane screamed past.

Nobody has come forward to say that they saw a missile.  Several different descriptions of the plane have been given, but the description of a silver American Airlines 757 is the most prevalent (because that’s what actually did hit the Pentagon).  Different people see different things, and we all remember things differently than others.  For instance, I once got into a fight with three girls outside a bar after another girl threw a bottle at me, missed and hit one of them.  One girl swore up and down that she saw me rear back and throw the bottle.  After the fight was dumped in the parking lot, and I was squaring off with three gangbangers who just wanted some violence, the man who screamed that he’d called the police swore he saw a man throw the bottle.  Were they lying?  Who knows.  Until I hear a person make statements that contradict previous ones, I don’t accuse them of lying.  It is more likely that the people in question merely saw something in passing and reacted to it.

Then again, in the world of 9/11 twooferism, the void is where their personal truth survives.  In the absence of concrete evidence is where their “proof” is found.  It only takes one question to make it reality for them.

Comments (1)

Madonna Hits Rock Bottom

Aug 25, 08 6:28 PM

Madonna compares John McCain to Hitler………..

This granny will apparently do anything for attention and it does not matter how many babies she has to adopt or how much botox she has to receive to get it!  The important thing is that Madonna has principles which are prioritized by her ability to get American press – even though she doesn’t live here anymore.

Of course the Dixie Chicks did a stupid thing when they bashed their President.  They made a sad attempt at a comeback and as we all see, even a politically-correct awarded grammy didn’t help them back.

Madonna now in her concert tour features a video montage during the performance of one of her songs which includes images of John McCain and Adolph Hitler in which she is comparing the two.  The song ends and everyone is happy where pictures of OBAMA, John Lennon, and Ghandi are shown.

Your political opinion is one thing, and I suppose we can all gather whom she is voting for in November.  But comparing John McCain, a man who has given up so much for his country, to Adolph Hitler is the most disgusting thing I think this woman has ever done (and I am even counting the time she rolled around naked with a german shephard in her “Sex” book). 

In the past, I’ve been a huge Madonna fan.  But this move takes away everything one could ever like about her.  In the 80′s, she was cool when she pushed buttons, in the 90′s she was cool when she pushed buttons, but this is an ultimate disgrace.

I hope her fan base (even Obama supporters can realize the difference between “political difference” and outright “slander”) makes her pay for this in the exact same way the Dixie Chicks had to pay for their screw up.

Madonna’s over and she’s more talentless & desperate now than she has ever been.

Comments (10)

The Right to Life

Aug 24, 08 3:48 PM

In debating the death penalty with some people, I’ve noticed something.  The majority of those who are against the death penalty support abortion rights.  It’s something I don’t understand in the least.  I’m not sure I want to.

This is where a gaggle of people go, “waitaminit–you’re a lesbian!  You’re supposed to be pro-choice!”  Well, I’m ‘posed to be a lot of things according to society.  The only thing I’m supposed to do is pay taxes and die.  It is possible, believe it or not, to believe in women’s rights and yet still believe that the unborn have rights, too.

There is a massive difference between the death penalty and abortion.  I love it when pro-abortion activists point out that I believe in the right to life and yet still believe in the death penalty, because the instant they turn around and protest an execution, I’m right there, nipping at their heels. 

I believe that life begins shortly after conception; when the heart is formed and begins to sustain that little life, that is when I believe an embryo becomes a life that should not be terminated.  This occurs at four weeks.  Past that, I believe abortion to be murder, taking a life that has no voice.  And the only purpose for it is convenience. 

Shouldn’t a woman have the right to choose when she will reproduce?  Shouldn’t a woman have the right to decide what to do with her body?  Absolutely!  That choice can be made before you hop in the sack with some guy, whether you know him or not, and create the condition you say you don’t want to be in.  Everything comes with consequences; if you drink too much, you get drunk and likely sick.  You can avoid getting sick by stopping before you get drunk.  If you then drive, you stand a good chance of getting into a wreck and hurting yourself or someone else.  If you break the law, you’re likely to get arrested; in that case, you no longer have the right to choose what to do with anything.

I run the risk of pissing a few off with this one, but it’s true.  Gay couples obviously can’t get pregnant.  But anyone who sleeps around–gay or straight–runs the risk of contracting who knows how many different STD’s, not the least of which are Hepatitis B and AIDS, both of which are equally deadly.  If you do not control yourself and your reactions you are begging for trouble, and pregnancy for straight couples is one of the big ones that causes issues.

What if you get pregnant after a rape?  Honey, if you’ve been raped, you need to go to the hospital, have a rape kit done, file a report and the doctor will offer you a morning-after pill that’ll take care of that.  You should have more respect for yourself in that instance than to let the piece of $@#^ who did it get away with it. 

A child cannot decide whether it wants to live.  It has no voice.  It does, however, have a beating heart, fingers, toes, eyes, a brain, and a soul.  It is incapable of doing wrong and has no ability to choose.  A criminal, on the other hand, has moved past that stage; he knows the difference between right and wrong, has the ability to choose, and has chosen to do wrong.  When that criminal takes a life for no purpose other than convenience, he is making a choice that will have a consequence–and it may very well be giving up his own life in return for the one he stole.

We have laws against animal cruelty.  Why?  Because animals do not have free will and thus are completely innocent.  Should we show more concern for other species simply because they’re cute?  The same rules apply to all who are pure, regardless of their appearance.  The right to choose begins before you do something that comes with a hefty consequence, not after.

Comments (14)

Question: How Does a 757 Disappear Into a 16-Foot Hole?

Aug 21, 08 7:08 PM

Answer: it doesn’t.  See for yourself.

Now that you’ve watched the video, here’s the kicker: the hole in the front wall of the Pentagon was not merely 16 feet in diameter.  This particular clip is patched together with a snippet from the now-famous crockumentary “Loose Change,” as well as pieces of a computer-simulated recreation of the crash from a History Channel piece on 9/11 conspiracy theories.  The maker, MikeHawkins, has several like it on his YouTube page. 

Before the collapse of the E ring after the crash, the hole in that ring was actually approximately 75-80 feet wide.  You can’t see it in the images in the video, because, guess what–the smoke and dust obscures the hole.  So where’d they get the 16-foot estimate?  From this image:

This is actually the funny part, because they admit this hole is 16 feet, too.  The theory, again, is that a missile hit the Pentagon, not a plane.  This was the last hole punched in the building, done on the C ring–and it was made not by the nose of the plane, but by the front landing gear, which was recovered just on the other side.

Another question: where are the wings?  Wouldn’t you see wing-like holes from a plane crashing into it?  Nope.  As I said previously, the impact would have sheared the wings off.  On a blast-resistant building like the Pentagon, the wings would not have created the cartoon-image hole that the twoofers say should exist.  This shot, in fact, shows proof that the wings DID do damage to the building:

Hey, they wanted answers.  Dylan Avery, the creator of Loose Change and the narrator you hear in the clip above, superimposes the computer-generated image of a 757 over a distant photo of the crash site while it was still on fire–and doesn’t even get the image over the hole!  Classic.

The windows next to the “hole” are next, and contrary to what the twoofers would have you believe, not all of them were completely intact.  Many of them were, and here’s why: they were designed by a glass company in Bessemer, Alabama, not far from one of the towns I lived in for a short time.  They were blastproof.  In other words, they were specifically designed to withstand a force beyond hurricane-force winds presented quite suddenly.  This was done after the Murrah building in Oklahoma City.

And the cable spools…oh, the spools.  It cracks me up that Avery can zoom in on those things, laying askew and quite obviously damaged in that shot, and seriously claim that they’re “untouched.”  Do they look untouched to you?

Some of the “questions” that they’re “demanding answers” for seem to be outright lies.  I’d like to be able to say that it’s just naivete, that they really just don’t understand how it would’ve worked, but they’re so adamant about defending themselves that, as Shakespeare wrote, “methinks thou doth protesteth too much.”

Comments (2)

Media Already Mischaracterizing the Plan for Withdrawal

Aug 21, 08 11:00 AM

Just a few hours later, the AP is now reporting that the withdrawal of troops may begin in June of next year. 

But what makes me chuckle is the opening statement of the article:

BAGHDAD – Iraq and the U.S. have reached preliminary agreement to withdraw American forces from Iraqi cities by next June, six years into the increasingly unpopular war

Uh, should that say “increasingly uncovered war?”

Next, it states:

The negotiations over a withdrawal timetable follow long insistence by President Bush that setting any schedule for U.S. troops to leave would be dangerous. The draft agreement with Iraq would link troop reductions to achievement of certain security milestones, although the details have not been made public.

What the hell does the media think is going to happen?  One day, we’re just going to send planes to gather them all up at once?  I do believe Bush stated – as was completely true – that setting a timetable BEFORE Iraq was on a clear path to success on its own, with their own military, would have been dangerous.

Amazingly, the media and liberals have lost concern for the troops and now have a new mission of their own: spend from now until November convincing Americans that this was a mission failed as opposed to a mission accomplished.

Comments (1)

Success Propelling Withdrawal

Aug 21, 08 9:12 AM

The AP reports this morning that Iraq and the United States are getting closer to an agreement to start setting a timetable and finally start bringing our guys home. 

This is after years of awesome work on behalf of our military and commander-in-chief. 

I remember the beginning and capturing a monster like Saddam Hussein alone seemed impossible yet we pulled it off.  Iraq has began re-building, writing its Constitution, has established a government, has held various elections where the people continue to show up in higher numbers everytime to take part in history – moving this once very-troubled and diseased country to a functioning democracy and a strong foothold for the United States so we may continue to monitor the terrorist evil happening around that region.

To all the naysayers, we couldn’t have done it without you.  As crazy as they drove us, we have to thank the naysayers because they exuded what happens in a great Democracy.  Iraq got to see first hand how people can co-exist in a functioning Democracy and completely disagree on one issue.  And contrary to liberal opinion, liberals got to create phony conspiracies about 9/11 (as covered wonderfully by Mel the last few days), call their President a terrorist, call the entire administration liars, and refrained from being fed through a wood-chipper!  Can you imagine what this did for the Iraqi people?  And even though it would have been a real hoot to watch just once, even the liberals’ hysteria about being hauled off to Guantanamo for dissenting from the President’s policies never materialized as well either. 

The only sad thing is that with violence down, the accomplishments made by our troops, the successful road our military is leaving Iraq in, this celebratory tone I fear will not make it to the hearts of our brave men and women who deserve it the most.  Now, we have a presidential election and suddenly the mainstream media doesn’t seem to care about Iraq anymore now that we have won.

Comments (1)

Obama’s Opposition to Abortion Bill

Aug 20, 08 8:44 PM

This has been quite a week for Obama starting with his apparent defeat at Saddleback last week.  But this one is a bit more serious.

Be prepared for liberals and the media to hysterically turn back to the “important issue” of whether or not Obama is a Muslim.  Most of us in the land of common sense know that this cannot be true because no Muslim would ever be pro-choice.  (If you think Christians were strict….)  But nonetheless, liberals will use it to deflect from real issues like this one.

It’s astonishing that he actually voted against a Bill in the Illinois legislature that Barbara Boxer (the leftest of the left until this point) supported which protected the life of a baby if it were born after a botched abortion.

Perhaps Ann Coulter is a bit over-the-top by stating that Obama wanted to make sure that doctors were chasing babies around the delivery room, but essentially this is a Bill that even people like Barbara Boxer supports.

Even the most pro-choicers out there would have to support this Bill because A.) the baby is already out of the body and B.) It’s no longer a question of the mother’s body or health.

Comments (1)
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 347 other followers