Trouble is, nobody has come forward to say such a thing. Here’s another twoofer video claiming “proof” that it wasn’t a plane:
How is this proof, you ask? Well, the poster, nineelevennews, states that this video proves that the witness who claimed to have seen the passenger’s faces in the plane that hit the Pentagon had to have been lying. In this video, you can’t even see the windows on the plane. In the description, the poster claims this as evidence that ALL of the witnesses were lying about what they saw. Since only one witness claims to have seen the passenger’s faces, I fail to see how this video would discredit all of them.
After the murder of Philadelphia police officer Danny Faulkner, defense attorneys have attempted to discredit evidence against the murderer, Mumia Abu Jamal, by pointing out a “witness” to the crime. William Singletary, a Vietnam vet and “local businessman,” has stated that he saw Mumia attempt to help Faulkner. But Singletary said a lot of things that were false. He swore up and down that Mumia wore a turban (he didn’t, he had dreadlocks), there was a police helicopter circling the area (Philly PD didn’t even own one until years after the shooting), Faulkner was shot in the face (impressive since Faulkner turned and shot Mumia as he was falling to the ground), and that he called for his children (Faulkner had no children). All of this after he told officers on the scene that he hadn’t seen anything.
Yes, it is entirely possible for a “witness” to lie. But is it not also possible that, in the case of the above video, the camera can’t focus the way the human eye can? Man has yet to invent any camera that can capture the images the human eye is capable of. We can see in darkness; cameras cannot. We can focus on something distinct in an image or scene; a camera cannot. It is possible that the witness lied, but it is also entirely possible that they did, in fact, focus on a few faces as the plane screamed past.
Nobody has come forward to say that they saw a missile. Several different descriptions of the plane have been given, but the description of a silver American Airlines 757 is the most prevalent (because that’s what actually did hit the Pentagon). Different people see different things, and we all remember things differently than others. For instance, I once got into a fight with three girls outside a bar after another girl threw a bottle at me, missed and hit one of them. One girl swore up and down that she saw me rear back and throw the bottle. After the fight was dumped in the parking lot, and I was squaring off with three gangbangers who just wanted some violence, the man who screamed that he’d called the police swore he saw a man throw the bottle. Were they lying? Who knows. Until I hear a person make statements that contradict previous ones, I don’t accuse them of lying. It is more likely that the people in question merely saw something in passing and reacted to it.
Then again, in the world of 9/11 twooferism, the void is where their personal truth survives. In the absence of concrete evidence is where their “proof” is found. It only takes one question to make it reality for them.




