<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It Wasn&#8217;t A Twist On Words&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gayconservative.org/2009/02/04/it-wasnt-a-twist-on-words/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gayconservative.org/2009/02/04/it-wasnt-a-twist-on-words/</link>
	<description>Resource for Gay Conservatives</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 03:17:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://gayconservative.org/2009/02/04/it-wasnt-a-twist-on-words/#comment-5746</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jay]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 23:47:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gayconservative.org/?p=1310#comment-5746</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[douchebaggery	

1)The philosophy held by douchebags, holding that no one other than themselves (or perhaps their close associates) matters in the least bit, and thus that other human beings can and should be treated like complete excrement for little or no reason (and often for selfish reasons). Closely related to fascism, which has been practiced by control freaks such as Adolf Hitler and Stevie of GayConservative.org.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>douchebaggery	</p>
<p>1)The philosophy held by douchebags, holding that no one other than themselves (or perhaps their close associates) matters in the least bit, and thus that other human beings can and should be treated like complete excrement for little or no reason (and often for selfish reasons). Closely related to fascism, which has been practiced by control freaks such as Adolf Hitler and Stevie of GayConservative.org.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://gayconservative.org/2009/02/04/it-wasnt-a-twist-on-words/#comment-5745</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 22:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gayconservative.org/?p=1310#comment-5745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;You’re the height of entertainment: a huge jackass who spouts such lame bullshit that from anyone else it would be assumed it was an intentional farce.&quot;

I kind of thought it was intentional too at first...

&quot;However, from you one gets the sense that you’re blissfully unaware of your inherent and wondrous douchebagery&quot;

Douchebaggery. Classic...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;You’re the height of entertainment: a huge jackass who spouts such lame bullshit that from anyone else it would be assumed it was an intentional farce.&#8221;</p>
<p>I kind of thought it was intentional too at first&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;However, from you one gets the sense that you’re blissfully unaware of your inherent and wondrous douchebagery&#8221;</p>
<p>Douchebaggery. Classic&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://gayconservative.org/2009/02/04/it-wasnt-a-twist-on-words/#comment-5743</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jay]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 21:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gayconservative.org/?p=1310#comment-5743</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Entertaining to say the least&quot;

Actually, Stevie, entertaining is watching you go through your illogical and pathetic rationalizing gyrations in the fruitless attempt to make a &quot;point&quot;.  You&#039;re the height of entertainment: a huge jackass who spouts such lame bullshit that from anyone else it would be assumed it was an intentional farce.  However, from you one gets the sense that you&#039;re blissfully unaware of your inherent and wondrous douchebagery.  Drone on, lil Stevie, drone on!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Entertaining to say the least&#8221;</p>
<p>Actually, Stevie, entertaining is watching you go through your illogical and pathetic rationalizing gyrations in the fruitless attempt to make a &#8220;point&#8221;.  You&#8217;re the height of entertainment: a huge jackass who spouts such lame bullshit that from anyone else it would be assumed it was an intentional farce.  However, from you one gets the sense that you&#8217;re blissfully unaware of your inherent and wondrous douchebagery.  Drone on, lil Stevie, drone on!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://gayconservative.org/2009/02/04/it-wasnt-a-twist-on-words/#comment-5737</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 20:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gayconservative.org/?p=1310#comment-5737</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“The fact that you said “never once threatened us” even after it was Hussein himself that went to the UN destroys the basis of your crackpot theory”

Why don’t you tell everyone on this forum when exactly Hussein threatened the United States, and we’ll see who the crackpot is. This war has been de-legitimized by anyone with half a brain. Barry Goldwater is probably spinning in his grave after what you monsters did to his party.

“If a nation was successful at impeachment against a President for lying about sex with an intern and what you say were indisputably true, Bush would be in jail by now”

Yeah, well, we’ll see what Eric holder has to say about that…

“But even though you know the evidence is stacked against you”

What planet are you living on? The evidence is stacked against ME? Where are the WMDs, Steve? Bush admitted to circumventing FISA when he eavesdropped on Americans, we have memos from John Yoo and David Addington authorizing the use of torture, we have Cheney defending it on national TV, what more evidence do you need to open your eyes? Are you really this stupid? I’d like to believe not, but you sure can play the part…

“He raised taxes, you should be in love with him.”

Yeah, he had no choice after Reagan’s retarded voodoo economics. “Read my lips: no new taxes” really meant “sorry, but my predecessor was a moron”

“You’re also forgetting that if Carter hadn’t turned against the Shah and began the love-hate relationship we held with the Iranians since the Shah was deposed that there would be no negotiations needed, the Middle East would not be overwhelmed with terrorism, 9/11 would not have occurred, and none of us had to walk on broken glass for the leaders there.”

There’s just so much wrong with that statement. First, you’re now admitting what the rest of the world knew, that Reagan capitulated to terrorists (something you previously called me a moron for – who’s the moron now?), but then you downshift into blaming the entire middle east conflict on Carter? What are you, retarded? How do you explain the hundreds of years of strife that occurred before he was even born? And we see here again your sycophantic nature, where you’d rather blame everyone except the guy who was charge on 9/11. I’ll ask again, was it Carter’s fault that Bush didn’t hold one single meeting regarding terrorism until early September 2001? Was it Carter’s fault that the DOJ cut anti terrorism funding on September 10, 2001? No, your party routinely capitulates to the demands of terrorists, and you have the nerve to blame Democrats for terrorism? You’re out of your mind.

“Shall we watch the 1980 election night coverage together?”

Sure, we also can watch the hostages being released simultaneously on picture in picture…

“Conservatives love Reagan because in order to replace their lack of arguments and logic, they insinuate hate against him, as they do against me.”

That does not even make sense…]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“The fact that you said “never once threatened us” even after it was Hussein himself that went to the UN destroys the basis of your crackpot theory”</p>
<p>Why don’t you tell everyone on this forum when exactly Hussein threatened the United States, and we’ll see who the crackpot is. This war has been de-legitimized by anyone with half a brain. Barry Goldwater is probably spinning in his grave after what you monsters did to his party.</p>
<p>“If a nation was successful at impeachment against a President for lying about sex with an intern and what you say were indisputably true, Bush would be in jail by now”</p>
<p>Yeah, well, we’ll see what Eric holder has to say about that…</p>
<p>“But even though you know the evidence is stacked against you”</p>
<p>What planet are you living on? The evidence is stacked against ME? Where are the WMDs, Steve? Bush admitted to circumventing FISA when he eavesdropped on Americans, we have memos from John Yoo and David Addington authorizing the use of torture, we have Cheney defending it on national TV, what more evidence do you need to open your eyes? Are you really this stupid? I’d like to believe not, but you sure can play the part…</p>
<p>“He raised taxes, you should be in love with him.”</p>
<p>Yeah, he had no choice after Reagan’s retarded voodoo economics. “Read my lips: no new taxes” really meant “sorry, but my predecessor was a moron”</p>
<p>“You’re also forgetting that if Carter hadn’t turned against the Shah and began the love-hate relationship we held with the Iranians since the Shah was deposed that there would be no negotiations needed, the Middle East would not be overwhelmed with terrorism, 9/11 would not have occurred, and none of us had to walk on broken glass for the leaders there.”</p>
<p>There’s just so much wrong with that statement. First, you’re now admitting what the rest of the world knew, that Reagan capitulated to terrorists (something you previously called me a moron for – who’s the moron now?), but then you downshift into blaming the entire middle east conflict on Carter? What are you, retarded? How do you explain the hundreds of years of strife that occurred before he was even born? And we see here again your sycophantic nature, where you’d rather blame everyone except the guy who was charge on 9/11. I’ll ask again, was it Carter’s fault that Bush didn’t hold one single meeting regarding terrorism until early September 2001? Was it Carter’s fault that the DOJ cut anti terrorism funding on September 10, 2001? No, your party routinely capitulates to the demands of terrorists, and you have the nerve to blame Democrats for terrorism? You’re out of your mind.</p>
<p>“Shall we watch the 1980 election night coverage together?”</p>
<p>Sure, we also can watch the hostages being released simultaneously on picture in picture…</p>
<p>“Conservatives love Reagan because in order to replace their lack of arguments and logic, they insinuate hate against him, as they do against me.”</p>
<p>That does not even make sense…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://gayconservative.org/2009/02/04/it-wasnt-a-twist-on-words/#comment-5734</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 19:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gayconservative.org/?p=1310#comment-5734</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“I could quote Rush Limbaugh who’s been around much longer than McClatchyDC and has more listeners than they have readers”

Rush Limbaugh is a pundit, McClatchy is a news organization with actual journalists who have won medals for journalistic independence. Good to see where you&#039;d rather get your &quot;news&quot;...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“I could quote Rush Limbaugh who’s been around much longer than McClatchyDC and has more listeners than they have readers”</p>
<p>Rush Limbaugh is a pundit, McClatchy is a news organization with actual journalists who have won medals for journalistic independence. Good to see where you&#8217;d rather get your &#8220;news&#8221;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steveflesher</title>
		<link>http://gayconservative.org/2009/02/04/it-wasnt-a-twist-on-words/#comment-5731</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[steveflesher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 19:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gayconservative.org/?p=1310#comment-5731</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Hitler had many followers too. Stevie, you remind me of the manager of the asshole store.&quot;

If there were such a thing, you certainly would know about it.  But apparently, you&#039;ve got too much time on your hands.

You liberals are all the same. Use bad sources to insult the troops and when someone slaps you with just a tiny bit of logic, that is your general type of response.

Entertaining to say the least.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Hitler had many followers too. Stevie, you remind me of the manager of the asshole store.&#8221;</p>
<p>If there were such a thing, you certainly would know about it.  But apparently, you&#8217;ve got too much time on your hands.</p>
<p>You liberals are all the same. Use bad sources to insult the troops and when someone slaps you with just a tiny bit of logic, that is your general type of response.</p>
<p>Entertaining to say the least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://gayconservative.org/2009/02/04/it-wasnt-a-twist-on-words/#comment-5730</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jay]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 19:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gayconservative.org/?p=1310#comment-5730</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;I could quote Rush Limbaugh who’s been around much longer than McClatchyDC and has more listeners than they have readers&quot;

Hitler had many followers too.  Stevie, you remind me of the manager of the asshole store.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I could quote Rush Limbaugh who’s been around much longer than McClatchyDC and has more listeners than they have readers&#8221;</p>
<p>Hitler had many followers too.  Stevie, you remind me of the manager of the asshole store.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steveflesher</title>
		<link>http://gayconservative.org/2009/02/04/it-wasnt-a-twist-on-words/#comment-5725</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[steveflesher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 17:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gayconservative.org/?p=1310#comment-5725</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Yeah, ’cause I totally need to lie to some jackass on the internet. Like I give a fuck what you think…&quot;

LOL.  Just do the calculation, jackass.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Yeah, ’cause I totally need to lie to some jackass on the internet. Like I give a fuck what you think…&#8221;</p>
<p>LOL.  Just do the calculation, jackass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steveflesher</title>
		<link>http://gayconservative.org/2009/02/04/it-wasnt-a-twist-on-words/#comment-5724</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[steveflesher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 17:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gayconservative.org/?p=1310#comment-5724</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;So, in other words, something has to be written by a right wing hack for you to believe it?&quot;

Something has to be written by someone without such a left-wing view yes.  I could quote Rush Limbaugh who&#039;s been around much longer than McClatchyDC and has more listeners than they have readers.

Would you accept that?

&quot;Oh my God. I am talking about income, jackass, income, income, income. No one gives a fuck about all the loopholes you find, no one cares about investments and capital gains, I am talking about income, that is all.&quot;

What do you think investments and capital gains are?  There are no &quot;loopholes.&quot;  You just made a butt of yourself.  Just accept it and move on.

&quot;The average tax rate on INCOME. it’s %17.17, jackass&quot;

On GROSS income before deductions. If you divided your tax by your GROSS income in lieu of your TAXABLE income, I guarantee you&#039;ll only find about 6% was paid in by you or retained by the treasury.  I guarantee it.  Not 23%.

The income is subject to interpretation when you&#039;re calculating your rate one way and taking this one to compare to yours.  It&#039;s not a realistic interpretation.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;So, in other words, something has to be written by a right wing hack for you to believe it?&#8221;</p>
<p>Something has to be written by someone without such a left-wing view yes.  I could quote Rush Limbaugh who&#8217;s been around much longer than McClatchyDC and has more listeners than they have readers.</p>
<p>Would you accept that?</p>
<p>&#8220;Oh my God. I am talking about income, jackass, income, income, income. No one gives a fuck about all the loopholes you find, no one cares about investments and capital gains, I am talking about income, that is all.&#8221;</p>
<p>What do you think investments and capital gains are?  There are no &#8220;loopholes.&#8221;  You just made a butt of yourself.  Just accept it and move on.</p>
<p>&#8220;The average tax rate on INCOME. it’s %17.17, jackass&#8221;</p>
<p>On GROSS income before deductions. If you divided your tax by your GROSS income in lieu of your TAXABLE income, I guarantee you&#8217;ll only find about 6% was paid in by you or retained by the treasury.  I guarantee it.  Not 23%.</p>
<p>The income is subject to interpretation when you&#8217;re calculating your rate one way and taking this one to compare to yours.  It&#8217;s not a realistic interpretation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steveflesher</title>
		<link>http://gayconservative.org/2009/02/04/it-wasnt-a-twist-on-words/#comment-5722</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[steveflesher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 17:34:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gayconservative.org/?p=1310#comment-5722</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Are you high? How is anything I’m saying crazy? If anything is crazy, it’s impeaching a guy getting a blowjob. But, the guy who invades an unarmed nation that never once threatened us (which is a violation of international law) gets a free pass?&quot;

The fact that you said &quot;never once threatened us&quot; even after it was Hussein himself that went to the UN destroys the basis of your crackpot theory.  My point is what you said exactly.  If a nation was successful at impeachment against a President for lying about sex with an intern and what you say were indisputably true, Bush would be in jail by now.  But even though you know the evidence is stacked against you, you continue to say it as if it were true, as if he were impeached, and as if he were arrested.

&quot;Tell you what, why don’t you go take that walk, and tell us how it goes…&quot;

Sure.

&quot;Let’s not forget daddy Bush, who imposed the sanctions you’re referring to in the first place.&quot;

Largely in part to Democratic caterwauling.  Daddy Bush was never my favorite anyway.  The best thing he did was give us Clarence Thomas.  He raised taxes, you should be in love with him.

&quot;You’re also forgetting how he refused to negotiate with terrorists…oh wait&quot;

You&#039;re also forgetting that if Carter hadn&#039;t turned against the Shah and began the love-hate relationship we held with the Iranians since the Shah was deposed that there would be no negotiations needed, the Middle East would not be overwhelmed with terrorism, 9/11 would not have occured, and none of us had to walk on broken glass for the leaders there.  Unfortunately because of Democrat ignorance, we are at this point.  Much like the 1994 deal with N. Korea.  They started building nukes before the ink was dry on the agreement and we gave them that fuel to do it, too.  Now, it&#039;s a much bigger problem because we tried to be friends, first.

&quot;Conservatives were pissed because he spanked Bush 41 and made him a one term loser.&quot;

Conservatives don&#039;t like Bush 41.  And Carter was a one-term HORRIBLE loser.  Shall we watch the 1980 election night coverage together?

&quot;Liberals hated Reagan because he despised the poor, just like someone else in this forum.&quot;

Conservatives love Reagan because in order to replace their lack of arguments and logic, they insinuate hate against him, as they do against me.

Mission accomplished!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Are you high? How is anything I’m saying crazy? If anything is crazy, it’s impeaching a guy getting a blowjob. But, the guy who invades an unarmed nation that never once threatened us (which is a violation of international law) gets a free pass?&#8221;</p>
<p>The fact that you said &#8220;never once threatened us&#8221; even after it was Hussein himself that went to the UN destroys the basis of your crackpot theory.  My point is what you said exactly.  If a nation was successful at impeachment against a President for lying about sex with an intern and what you say were indisputably true, Bush would be in jail by now.  But even though you know the evidence is stacked against you, you continue to say it as if it were true, as if he were impeached, and as if he were arrested.</p>
<p>&#8220;Tell you what, why don’t you go take that walk, and tell us how it goes…&#8221;</p>
<p>Sure.</p>
<p>&#8220;Let’s not forget daddy Bush, who imposed the sanctions you’re referring to in the first place.&#8221;</p>
<p>Largely in part to Democratic caterwauling.  Daddy Bush was never my favorite anyway.  The best thing he did was give us Clarence Thomas.  He raised taxes, you should be in love with him.</p>
<p>&#8220;You’re also forgetting how he refused to negotiate with terrorists…oh wait&#8221;</p>
<p>You&#8217;re also forgetting that if Carter hadn&#8217;t turned against the Shah and began the love-hate relationship we held with the Iranians since the Shah was deposed that there would be no negotiations needed, the Middle East would not be overwhelmed with terrorism, 9/11 would not have occured, and none of us had to walk on broken glass for the leaders there.  Unfortunately because of Democrat ignorance, we are at this point.  Much like the 1994 deal with N. Korea.  They started building nukes before the ink was dry on the agreement and we gave them that fuel to do it, too.  Now, it&#8217;s a much bigger problem because we tried to be friends, first.</p>
<p>&#8220;Conservatives were pissed because he spanked Bush 41 and made him a one term loser.&#8221;</p>
<p>Conservatives don&#8217;t like Bush 41.  And Carter was a one-term HORRIBLE loser.  Shall we watch the 1980 election night coverage together?</p>
<p>&#8220;Liberals hated Reagan because he despised the poor, just like someone else in this forum.&#8221;</p>
<p>Conservatives love Reagan because in order to replace their lack of arguments and logic, they insinuate hate against him, as they do against me.</p>
<p>Mission accomplished!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

