March 2009
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
« Feb   Apr »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  

Month March 2009

Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell, Don’t…What?

I know I promised a blog on violence perpetrated by liberal activists, but I’ve been going non-stop since I made that promise. This is literally the first chance I’ve had to sit down and think about anything other than work, and I had to point something out. I will deliver on my promise, but for now, I think this is more pressing.

It’s come across the wires that the 2010 budget includes funding for continuing the enforcement of DADT. “Don’t ask, don’t tell, don’t pursue, don’t harass” was signed into law by Bill Clinton in 1994 after he made a campaign promise to end the military ban on homosexuals in service. The same guy who promised to be a friend to the gay community gave us DOMA (the Defense of Marriage Act) shortly after DADT. Last year, during the heated presidential campaigns, Barack Obama made a promise to end DADT and the ban for good.

Considering how things have gone so far, should we really be surprised that he has not only not kept his promise, but has extended the life of the policy?

He promised change. What’s changed? He’s managed to nearly triple the national deficit with a pork-laden spending bill that the Associated Press has finally agreed had absolutely no basis in reality whatsoever. We thought Bush economic policies were bad with his bailout? I was pretty sure we wanted that crap to stop, yet Obama has handed out more bailout money since he entered office than Bush did in eight years. The man has only been in office for seventy days! He talked a big game about “applying some flinty Chicago toughness” to D.C. in regards to the weather, yet he can’t even do what he’s calling on the rest of America to do–turn down his own freakin’ thermostat. Where’s the example? Geez, at least Carter put on a sweater, lit a fire in the White House fireplace and did exactly what he expected everyone else to do.

Should it really surprise us that Obama hasn’t come close to carrying out the promises he made to the gay community? When Kerry was running against Bush, I told everyone to beware: he was NOT going to be the savior of the gay community. I said the same thing when Obama was running, and hardly anyone believed me. Now we’ve got some of the gay news agencies quietly sticking in the back pages the news that Obama isn’t keeping his promise after all. Why can’t we all just admit it? Another politician lied to gain our trust and votes. I’d rather vote for someone who isn’t going to lie to me about giving me my rights than a man who will get on TV, tell a slick lie, do it with all the conviction in the world and not care that he has no intention of following through.

Don’t ask, don’t tell–don’t mess with the way things are. Lord knows if he pisses off too many people he won’t get re-elected. We can’t have that, now, can we?

I’m gettin’ a little tired of being used as a damned bargaining chip. Mark my words, folks, that’s exactly what we are.

Palin Remains the Most Hated

See, it’s issues like this that make me love Sarah Palin. 

Last week, she received a blasting from liberals when indeed she turned down most of the chunk of stimulus from Washington D.C. for her state.  Liberals were not so happy about that.

Of course now that they won’t be able to label her a lover of pork in case she re-runs in 2012, they are accusing her of doing it strictly for political reasons.

Flash forward to today – she’s in the middle of another “ethics complaint” by someone who happens to be a crazy liberal blogger of course.  This time, for wearing Arctic Cat clothing at Todd’s snow mobiling events last year.  Palin responded like a real American would:

Yes, I wore Arctic Cat snow gear at an outdoor event, because it was cold outside, and by the way, today, I am wearing clothes bearing the names of Alaska artists, and a Glennallen Panthers basketball hoodie,” Palin said in the release. “I am a walking billboard for the team’s fundraiser! Should I expect to see an ethics charge for wearing these, or the Carhartts I wear to many public events? How much will this blogger’s asinine political grandstanding cost all of us in time and money?

The article which details the “concerns” of the big-government loving leftie is quite humoring. 

Hey Sarah, it’s only taxpayer money right?  Perhaps you should get some of that stimulus afterall.

Philip, this is why our party cannot afford to “move on” from a political figure this priceless.  (Whose TV appearances alone still received more viewers than Obama’s inauguration).

The banner lives on!

Barney Frank, STFU!!!

The gay community has plenty of challenges to overcome in our quest for equal marriage rights. Many conservatives (and a fair number of liberals) are against gay marriage, mostly because of their religious leanings. Some aren’t religious at all; they just think it’s wrong to allow couples of the same sex the right to marry, flying in the face of thousands of years of tradition. Gay and lesbian people make up barely more than 2% of the total population, so we’re naturally outnumbered. Plenty of lawmakers feel that it would be detrimental to American society to allow gay marriage. The Defense of Marriage Act was passed by a largely Republican Senate and House and signed into law by none other than Bill Clinton (and he was supposed to be our hero!). As if we didn’t have enough problems as it is…

Enter Barney Frank and his huge freakin’ yapper.

That brainless, toothless wonder said in an interview with an as-yet-unnamed gay news agency, “At some point, [the Defense of Marriage Act] is going to have to go to the United States Supreme Court…I wouldn’t want it to go to the United States Supreme Court now because that homophobe Antonin Scalia has got too many votes on this current court.”

Oh.My.God.

Barney, could you be just a little more inflammatory? Could you make it any more difficult for us than it already is? Instead of trying to have a civil conversation with those who disagree with us, you’re going to insult them all just like your constituents? Is it possible in the least for you to try to be nice? Has it occurred to you that they might be more willing to listen if you WOULD be nice? Of course not! You’re too busy griping and moaning about how unfair it is for you.

You have just guaranteed that there is no way in heaven, hell or on Earth that the current SCOTUS will ever render a vote in our favor on the issue of gay marriage. The further you push this issue, the more you insult Justice Scalia and those who think the way he does, the worse you make it for us. Scalia isn’t going anywhere any time soon. And the way you Democrats are playing now, conservatives will win the day in 2010 and 2012–guaranteeing that Obama will have one hell of a hard time getting anyone more liberal than O’Connor named to the bench. You’re not helping our chances with this kind of garbage.

Do us a favor, Barney, and SHUT UP.

Obama’s Very Own Harriet Miers Debacle

(I have to point out the amazing stupidity of last week. Tammy Bruce, my favorite conservative lesbian and proof that I can’t possibly be single forever because I’m not the only one out there, compiled a list of Obama gaffes all made last week. First he compared credit and mortgages to exploding toasters, drawing on an economic analyst’s comments in 2007. Then he compared AIG to suicide bombers. Next, on St. Patrick’s day, he thanked himself for inviting everyone to the White House during a teleprompter meltdown after the Taoiseach read Obama’s speech over again, after which he insulted the Irish by telling them not to be caught wearing lampshades in front of the cameras. He topped it off on Jay Leno with a horrid “joke”–that he was practicing his bowling skills at the White House and his score was 129, then said, “it was like the Special Olympics or something!” Barkey had a full week. If Bush had been caught saying ANY of these things, he’d have been tarred and feathered.)

I’m sure we all remember Bush’s hare-brained SCOTUS nomination in October 2005. Harriet Miers, a member of Bush’s staff (whom some claimed Bush owed a favor or two), was nominated to take Sandra Day O’Connor’s place on the Supreme Court bench. However, when questioned by lawmakers Miers demonstrated a lack of ability to describe basic Constitutional rights and the laws that support them. Miers was a poor choice, and everyone–even Republicans–let Bush know it. Miers withdrew from the nomination herself to save face.

Obama has just created his own Harriet Miers problem. Ladies and gentlemen, I give you David F. Hamilton.

Per The Other McCain, Obama has nominated David F. Hamilton to sit on the US Court of Appeals, the Seventh Circuit. Hamilton has an impressive record…AS A FUNDRAISER FOR ACORN! Fan-freakin’-tastic. The organization responsible for thousands of cases of voter fraud, pressuring banks to make risky loans to people who can’t afford them, and now breaking into foreclosed homes for the same people who couldn’t afford the mortgages in the first place is where Hamilton got much of his experience. THIS is the change Barkey is bringing? My God. I don’t even want to know how much worse it can get.

Here’s what’s really galling: Republican Senator Richard Lugar, from Indiana, is absolutely ecstatic about the nomination–and the Senate approval of it. If rolling my eyes could make a sound it would be deafening.

Someone get me a barf bag.

God save us from bipartisanship! (Note to those bloggers who have made remarks about Obama suggesting Hamilton for SCOTUS: shut yer freakin’ pie holes! There is no excuse for giving this man any encouragement!!!)

The Thin Blue Line

The “thin blue line” of police is four men thinner today. In Oakland, California, a criminal wanted for parole violation started not one but TWO shoot-outs with the police. News first was that three officers were killed and a fourth was in critical condition. That has just changed. All four wounded officers have been taken home.

danielsakai2ervinromans2johnhege3sgtmarkdunakin2

Daniel Sakai, Ervin Romans, John Hege and Sgt. Mark Dunakin.

Lovelle Mixon is the name of the monster who committed this crime. I’ll post more about him as I’m able to find out what he was on parole for.

To the Oakland PD: you have our profound sympathy and sadness. You’re in our prayers.

Godspeed, gentlemen. Thank you for your sacrifice.

Oh Really: Obama and Iran

Well kids – it looks like it’s time for another game of “Oh Really?” (conservative-style).  The subject of this edition?  The illustrious Mr. Obama.

The messiah - having solved the economic crisis, lowered the sea levels, ended poverty, and achieved global harmony – decided to turn his focus to more leisurely endeavors.  Things like filling out his NCAA basketball bracket, making fun of the handicapped with Jay Leno on national television and making sweet videos for the Iranians.  This last one really blew my mind.

Get this line of bull. 

President Barack Obama is reaching out to the Iranian people in a new video with Farsi subtitles, saying the U.S. is prepared to end years of strained relations if Tehran tones down its bellicose rhetoric….

“So in this season of new beginnings I would like to speak clearly to Iran’s leaders,” Obama said in the video. “We have serious differences that have grown over time. My administration is now committed to diplomacy that addresses the full range of issues before us, and to pursuing constructive ties among the United States, Iran and the international community….”

In his message Friday, Obama had a warning for Tehran: “This process will not be advanced by threats. We seek instead engagement that is honest and grounded in mutual respect.”

“You, too, have a choice. The United States wants the Islamic Republic of Iran to take its rightful place in the community of nations,” Obama said. “You have that right, but it comes with real responsibilities, and that place cannot be reached through terror or arms, but rather through peaceful actions that demonstrate the true greatness of the Iranian people and civilization.”

So, Mr. Obama – you think that 30 years of US policy aimed at Iran is wrong-headed and stubborn?  Ronald Reagan, George HW, George W and, yes, even Bubba were misguided in their attempts to punish Iran for their support (financial and military) of terrorist groups.  The Iranian calls for the destruction of Israel were just silly little words.  And Iran’s insistance on pursuing nuclear weapons is just a little misunderstanding.  After all they are just a “tiny country” that poses no threat, right?

OH REALLY?????

And so – Mr. Obama, Mr. President, Barry ole pal – you’re gonna undo 30 years of “misguided” US policy towards Iran by making a sweet, precious video.  You’re going to extend the hand of friendship to Iran’s theocratic thugs.  They just need to be not-so-mean – play nice, say nice things about others, and maybe smile a little more.  That’ll solve everything, eh?

OH REALLY????

Well, buddy.  Iran’s supreme dude, responded to your video message.  You know what he said?

Khamenei set the bar impossibly high — demanding an overhaul of U.S. foreign policy, including giving up “unconditional support” for Israel and halting claims that Iran is seeking nuclear arms. Iran insists its nuclear program is only for peaceful energy purposes.

“Have you released Iranian assets? Have you lifted oppressive sanctions? Have you given up mudslinging and making accusations against the great Iranian nation and its officials?” Khamenei said in a speech in the northeastern city of Mashhad. The crowd chanted “Death to America.”

“He (Obama) insulted the Islamic Republic of Iran from the first day. If you are right that change has come, where is that change? What is the sign of that change? Make it clear for us what has changed.”

Oh no.  Sounds like they aren’t gonna play nice, Mr. Obama.  Of course – it wasn’t all bad for you.

Still, Khamenei left the door open to better ties with America, saying “should you change, our behavior will change, too.”

Well, there you have it, Barry.  All we have to do is concede that the US has been wrong for 30 years and change our ways.  Just denounce Israel, back off the nuclear thing and turn a blind eye to Iranian support for Hamas and Hezbollah.  That shouldn’t be too hard for you.  You already have your folks kissing Syria’s rear-end, and you’re going to give the Palestinians nearly 1 billion of American taxpayer dollars (we don’t need that money anyway).  So, acquiescing to Iran’s demands just seems to follow the natural course of things.  Then all the radical Islamist guys over there will love us and stop killing us.  And we will all have you to thank, Mr. President.

Let’s take a break now.  The point of “Oh Really?” is to point out that someone has lost touch with any semblance of reality.  Obama has reached that point.  He has gone and humiliated the United States with this garbage, making us appear weak and, quite frankly, ignorant.  You want mutual respect from Iran, Barry.  Did you hear any respect from Khameni?  I sure as hell didn’t. This is unforgivable.

Mr. Obama – there have been many Euro-liberals before you who have tried this approach with Iran and their ilk.  They thought that we just weren’t open enough.  We just needed to try and be understanding, culturally-sensitive and open to dialogue.  Where the hell did that get any of them?  Iran’s behavior has not changed despite this kowtowing, ass-kissing type of message.  You think this will all change just because it came from you, Mr. Obama?  I realize that you might believe it will.  After all – you are the messiah.  And you are accustomed to the adulation and adoring crowds who take your every word as gospel.  Hope and change, dude. Hope and change.

Well, here’s a message for you.  You and the Ivy League nerds that comprise your administration are naive at best and dangerous at worst.  Your socialist/marxist professors indoctrinated you with worthless, failed economic theory.  They made you believe that a socialist, utopian economy and social structure could actually work despite the fact that it has failed over and over again.  Similarly, you guys were brainwashed by American-hating “educators” who railed against those damned neocons.  They taught you that you must be embarrased by your nation.  They threw around phrases like “social justice” and “hegemony” to emphasize the need for your guilt.

And, so, it leads you to do something as shameful and ridiculous as this.  The slap in the face that you received from Iran should be a lesson to you.  But I doubt you learn that lesson.  You and your kind are oblivious and blind.  There is no hope for you.  The only hope is that your presidency is short and that the damage you do can be undone by those who come after you.

 

 

Change…At What Cost?

I said before Barkey was elected that the promises of change without a road map were a dangerous thing. We’re now finding out exactly HOW dangerous. It’s costing us more than we were willing to give.

Via Tammy Bruce, the news is that Barkey partied his green boxers off for St. Patrick’s day. Traditionally, the President meets with the Taoiseach (head of the government of Ireland, even over the Irish president) on St. Patrick’s day. This year, the new Fuhrer (er…ah, I meant President!) threw a massive party at the White House on our buck. AGAIN. This time his guest list was nearly 200 strong. I wonder if wagyu beef was on the menu again. According to Barry O, Americans need to be willing to tighten their belts. I don’t see a very good example being set.

That’s just the beginning of my latest gripe. Have you seen the news about AIG’s latest bailout request? They posted a $60 billion loss, and turned around and asked the government for an additional $30 billion in bailout funds. Strangely, they’re still able to pay out more than $160 in corporate bonuses in their Financial Products division, which is the same wing of the company that brought them to the brink of collapse last year and required a massive infusion of TARP funds. Outraged lawmakers in Washington, D.C. hurriedly wrote a bill that would stop corporate bonuses from being paid by companies that had requested bailout money, both from Bush Jr. and from the current administration.

Senator Chris Dodd, however, after feigning the same outrage over corporate bonuses, wrote a loophole into the legislation. It basically says that the law only applies to corporate bonuses written into contract after February 11, 2009. That pretty well allows all of the corporate bonuses that were in contractual agreements with employees and nearly cuts the balls completely off of the legislation. It gets better.

Dodd received $103,100 in campaign contributions for the 2008 elections.

Dodd isn’t the only one paid off by AIG. SENATOR Obama accepted $101,332 in campaign contributions. Gee, I wonder what’s going on.

AIG’s monkey business spurred the economic collapse we’re trying to recover from (along with Citibank). I wondered from the start why we were bailing out AIG, because they’re not as important to the world economy as some of the other banking giants. 11 of the executives who received million-dollar-plus bonuses quit as soon as they got their money, and they don’t have to pay it back. Are we seriously still going to keep dumping money into the black hole that is AIG? Of course! Barkey’s bought and paid for!

This is the kind of change we voted for? I don’t even want to know how much worse it can get. I’m also reading reports that The Man is concocting a plan to make wounded veterans pay for their own healthcare, and is even chewing on the idea of taxing healthcare benefits–all after he promised to lower healthcare costs. This is a fantastic idea–jack up the costs on everyone so that the citizenry begs for socialized healthcare. The only problem is we’re catching on before he can implement the plan.

At least I hope we are. This is our “change”…but at what cost?

A Lesson In Manners

My first job ever, while I was still in high school, was at a Carl’s Jr. restaurant in Northwest Phoenix. I learned a lot about people there. It amazed me how normally mild-mannered people could behave when they didn’t get what they wanted, when they wanted it. People I’d see at church would go there for dinner and, not recognizing me immediately, would get impatient and yell when their order wasn’t prepared quickly enough. More than once, the manager at the Hogi Yogi restaurant across the street–where my younger sister worked–became so enraged about his food not being hot enough for his liking that he’d rear back and “return” it full-force into my face, leaving a mass of goop all over my uniform.

I’m now thirty years old and I haven’t eaten at a Carl’s Jr. since. Not because I don’t trust the people preparing the food, but because the experience was terrible.

Since then I’ve held a few different jobs, usually in the same vein. I never say online which agency I work for, because I don’t speak for them. There’s certain details I won’t give out, either, because they would give my employer’s identity away. Everywhere I’ve worked, from Carl’s Jr. to now, I’ve dealt with difficult people of all breeds. Both coworkers and customers have gotten me riled up with their behavior, and when I was younger, I was far less controlled. When I was a corrections officer it was simple: if an inmate gets in your face, you have the right to put ‘em on the floor, cuff ‘em and ship ‘em off to the SHU. After that kind of freedom with people who behave badly, it can be very difficult to follow rules that require you to remain peppy and professional even when speaking to an unruly customer on the phone. But let me tell you…when I left work today, I was playing my favorite Disturbed album at top volume.

I’m not an angry person, but I was very angry when I left work today due to the intense stress I experienced. I’m a fraud investigator. Part of my job is to analyze credit accounts for potential fraud, and in some cases contact the customer to verify any number of things (changes to pertinent information, new credit cards mailed out, new users added to accounts, charges that appear suspicious, etc.). I talk to a lot of different people every day. Understandably, some are suspicious of me and refuse to talk to me. Some don’t understand how the credit process works. Some of the people I talk to are grateful that someone like me is watching out for them, because otherwise they’d be paying for a criminal’s fraudulent purchases. But there are also those who have little ability to be nice, much less merely civil. Abusive customers are normally rare for me. Today, though, I handled an inordinate number of very abusive people, none of whom seemed to grasp the very plain, precise information I was trying to give them. Anger over their perceived inconvenience clouded their judgment to the point that logic and common sense were replaced with insults, taunting and a tacit refusal to hear any explanation.

Now it amazes me how hostile people can become when they feel they’re being inconvenienced. Today’s Americans seem to think they are entitled to never be put out when trying to obtain something they want, and it shows in the way some people talk to the representatives at their banks. First of all, being declined for a purchase while using your credit card can be frustrating, and people like me fully understand that. I’ve been declined for that, too. But in my case it turned out that there were over a thousand dollars in fraudulent charges on my account, and I had a voice mail from an investigator trying to verify that those charges weren’t mine; I just hadn’t gotten the message yet. Was I upset that I had trouble using my card? Sure. I had a backup plan, though, and I implemented it. I was able to finish what I was doing and call my bank when I got home and got the message I’d missed up to that point. At no time does a frustrating situation give you a pass to behave like a two-year-old.

Which brings me to my second point. It is unwise to leave yourself with only one payment option everywhere you go, especially if you’re traveling. A debit card or emergency credit card is a very good idea, and knowledge of your bank’s 24-hour service phone numbers is also a very good idea. If you only have one method of payment and something happens, you’re in trouble. This was a lesson I had to learn the hard way; while spending the weekend with friends in San Diego, just before my school semester was due to begin, I left my card at a bar. I carried no cash and had to have a friend bail me out with a loan because when I went back to the bar the next morning, the owner had lost track of it and I was suddenly up shit creek with a broken paddle (with, as another friend would say, a pack of woodland creatures pointing and laughing at me). It was embarrassing to have to ask a friend to float me a loan until I got home. Had I thought ahead and had a backup, I wouldn’t have been caught in such a precarious situation.

My third point is that credit card fraud is a very popular thing. There are people out there make their whole living by using other peoples’ high-limit credit accounts to get what they want. They are very creative, very cunning, and completely unconcerned with the effect their actions have on the rest of society. Most often, when a fraud perpetrator is caught, they say the same thing: “I wasn’t hurting anybody!” That is genuinely how they look at it. It’s remarkably narcissistic, for sure, but they don’t realize the impact they’re having on the world around them and don’t care. That’s where folks like me come in. We’re trained well to be able to spot the warning signs and make sure our customers are aware of what’s going on. We won’t just put a hold on your account because we feel like it. If we’ve done that, it’s because we highly suspect that someone with no good intent has hijacked your information and is trying to dump their expenses on you. We want to protect you from that. So when we tell you that we need to verify security on the account, don’t take it as a slight against you. We’re not trying to make your life difficult. We’re actually trying to ease your life from the worry of paying for someone else’s lavish lifestyle, and we do the things we do because they’re tested and effective. If you start swearing, becoming sarcastic and generally combative, we’re not going to help you. If all you do is get angry because you were inconvenienced and you refuse to cooperate, your account is going to remain on hold until we can be sure that releasing it for use isn’t going to be a risk to both us and you. Being verbally abusive isn’t going to get you anywhere. So simmer down, take a valium if you have to, and learn to be nice. As my father always taught me, you catch more bees with honey than you do with vinegar.

Finally, a tidbit of information that every single soul in the banking and investment industry will tell you is God’s honest truth: there is not one person alive that is too good to be fired as a client. Regardless of how much money you have or how profitable it is to have you as a client, if you are abusive enough, YOU can be fired. So if you are genuinely incapable of being civil when you’re angry, then calm down before you make that call, or your life will become that much more difficult. Nobody is paid enough to be abused–not police, not firefighters, not doctors, not fast-food clerks, not bankers. Period.

Bottom line, that voice on the other end of the line is a PERSON. They are as human as you are. Talk to that person the way you would talk to your loved ones, because you likely wouldn’t be happy if someone you loved were being treated so poorly.

I like my fire department’s motto. It’s simple. It’s short, sweet, and to-the-point. And whether I’m at my job as an investigator or working as an EMT for that fire department, or I’m a customer myself, I like to keep it in mind:

BE NICE.

(For more information on credit card fraud and tips, visit the FTC’s website.)

Blurb Of The Day

Credit this bit of genius to Iowa Senator Chuck Grassley (R) as posted on FoxNews.com:

On Saturday, Grassley criticized Obama’s proposals for tax increases as failing “to connect all the dots.” The senator said the major tax increases will only force people to drop out of the work force, reducing tax revenue to pay down the deficit.

“There’s evidence that the president and his people understand this, even if their budget doesn’t show it,” Grassley said. “They say they don’t want to raise taxes until 2011 because the economy is too weak. … Well, if the president admits that tax increases hurt the economy, that will be true in two years as it is true today.”

Touche, Chuck!

Suggestions of a New Banner?

Guys, it’s no secret that I have loved Sarah Palin since her arrival in November.  I thought she was cool with her no-nonsense persona and loved that her family and life were really very similar to that of the rest of the nation.  Even after the election, the more liberals continue to call her “stupid” or “corrupt,” the adjectives seemed to make me love her even more – seeings as what some of those same people say about Reagan to this day.

My problem is with Bristol – her daughter.  I have no problem ridding the Republican party of phony conservatives like John McCain or any of the members of Congress who voted “yes” to any part of Obama’s spendorama.

Bristol and the father of her child I gather are officially announcing a split.  No marriage and no two-parent home for the baby they just brought into the world.

This girl (Bristol) was raised by two loving parents and is now purposely subjecting a child to a life without a permanent father figure.  I cannot support this and will not even though her mother is the best thing for our country in my eyes.

The question is, where does this leave Sarah?  Of course Bristol is an adult now.  Is Sarah obligated to make a statement on this?  Or is this still just a private family matter?

Knowing what single motherhood has done to this country in terms of crime and poverty, it seems to me that issues which start out as “private family matters” become public matters when someone is victim of a crime committed by a child raised without a strong father or our tax dollars are raised to support children who are being raised by single mothers without educations or careers.

I’ve seen it first-hand and I’ve seen it abroad.  Kids raised without dads have a 50-times higher rate of turning out to be crappy adults that the rest of us have to put up with forever.  I wouldn’t have a problem with “private family matters” if the troubles that come out of the situations stayed within the families as well.  But frankly, it doesn’t.

The governor should encourage her to put that kid up for adoption at once, should adopt the child herself to be raised by her and Todd, or should encourage Bristol to get over herself and to marry the guy she once loved enough to make a baby with. 

This child deserves a dad who is not around only on the weekends.

Palin’s daughter Bristol splits from fiance

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 172 other followers