<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sarah&#8217;s Reason?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gayconservative.org/2009/07/05/sarahs-reason/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gayconservative.org/2009/07/05/sarahs-reason/</link>
	<description>Resource for Gay Conservatives</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 16:34:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://gayconservative.org/2009/07/05/sarahs-reason/#comment-7972</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 20:41:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gayconservative.org/?p=1689#comment-7972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah, I remember back when I wrote a post about one of her then-concerns against Palin, she attempted to send me an e-mail describing herself as an independent.  This was back when the Walt Monegan issue was occurring.  See now, it&#039;s easier for these people to gloss over what really happened with more-than-a-dash of fantasy as if Sarah was really found guilty of anything.  

Then miraculously from her same IP address, we received some horrible comments on here from another alias cussing us up one end and down the next.

Amazing stuff.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I remember back when I wrote a post about one of her then-concerns against Palin, she attempted to send me an e-mail describing herself as an independent.  This was back when the Walt Monegan issue was occurring.  See now, it&#8217;s easier for these people to gloss over what really happened with more-than-a-dash of fantasy as if Sarah was really found guilty of anything.  </p>
<p>Then miraculously from her same IP address, we received some horrible comments on here from another alias cussing us up one end and down the next.</p>
<p>Amazing stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John in CA</title>
		<link>http://gayconservative.org/2009/07/05/sarahs-reason/#comment-7970</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John in CA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 18:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gayconservative.org/?p=1689#comment-7970</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.examiner.com/x-2547-Watchdog-Politics-Examiner~y2009m7d6-Palin-defamation-suit-could-cost-Moore-thousands-in-legal-fees

I think Sarah Palin should sue Shannyn Moore and bankrupt her.   I&#039;d love to see this beast blogger lose everything she has now and everything she may ever have.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-2547-Watchdog-Politics-Examiner~y2009m7d6-Palin-defamation-suit-could-cost-Moore-thousands-in-legal-fees" rel="nofollow">http://www.examiner.com/x-2547-Watchdog-Politics-Examiner~y2009m7d6-Palin-defamation-suit-could-cost-Moore-thousands-in-legal-fees</a></p>
<p>I think Sarah Palin should sue Shannyn Moore and bankrupt her.   I&#8217;d love to see this beast blogger lose everything she has now and everything she may ever have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John in CA</title>
		<link>http://gayconservative.org/2009/07/05/sarahs-reason/#comment-7969</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John in CA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 18:40:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gayconservative.org/?p=1689#comment-7969</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree Steve.  I think if Sarah Palin&#039;s husband had been the Governor then we&#039;d have seen a totally different take on everything.   There is a double standard at work here.  It is not fair.   

18 ethics probes?   There are more people in my county than in the state of Alaska.  I have a difficult time believing any political jurisdiction of less than 800,000 people has ethics troubles.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree Steve.  I think if Sarah Palin&#8217;s husband had been the Governor then we&#8217;d have seen a totally different take on everything.   There is a double standard at work here.  It is not fair.   </p>
<p>18 ethics probes?   There are more people in my county than in the state of Alaska.  I have a difficult time believing any political jurisdiction of less than 800,000 people has ethics troubles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://gayconservative.org/2009/07/05/sarahs-reason/#comment-7968</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 18:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gayconservative.org/?p=1689#comment-7968</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But this raises another stellar Palin standard. Palin actually hired legal teams of her own and drained her own finances to the tune of $600K in answering these preposterous ethics probes.  There were 18 filed against her in one year and she won every single one of them.  

I am ticked as a Republican that we allowed (in a small way) this to happen.  This was an amazing candidate that had an intrinsic quality that reached the people who had excellent values and a true servant&#039;s heart, and all of the things done to her, said about her, about her family, etc.....what goes around comes around however and those responsible will wind up paying dearly.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But this raises another stellar Palin standard. Palin actually hired legal teams of her own and drained her own finances to the tune of $600K in answering these preposterous ethics probes.  There were 18 filed against her in one year and she won every single one of them.  </p>
<p>I am ticked as a Republican that we allowed (in a small way) this to happen.  This was an amazing candidate that had an intrinsic quality that reached the people who had excellent values and a true servant&#8217;s heart, and all of the things done to her, said about her, about her family, etc&#8230;..what goes around comes around however and those responsible will wind up paying dearly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://gayconservative.org/2009/07/05/sarahs-reason/#comment-7967</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 18:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gayconservative.org/?p=1689#comment-7967</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The woman in question I believe is Shannyn Moore.  Her link is in my post and this blogger was actually personally acknowleged in the quote above by Palin&#039;s attorney.  What will this woman talk about now?  Makes ya wonder.  Her MSNBC days with Olbermann are probably over now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The woman in question I believe is Shannyn Moore.  Her link is in my post and this blogger was actually personally acknowleged in the quote above by Palin&#8217;s attorney.  What will this woman talk about now?  Makes ya wonder.  Her MSNBC days with Olbermann are probably over now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: melmaguire</title>
		<link>http://gayconservative.org/2009/07/05/sarahs-reason/#comment-7965</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[melmaguire]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 17:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gayconservative.org/?p=1689#comment-7965</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is harassment.  With ethics complaints, the people pay--it&#039;s not the same as a straight-up lawsuit.  The state legislature has to assign investigators to each complaint.  I haven&#039;t read much about the woman in question, but no doubt we&#039;ll find she&#039;s a hard-left lib who can&#039;t stand the idea of a hard-working conservative woman doing well for herself.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is harassment.  With ethics complaints, the people pay&#8211;it&#8217;s not the same as a straight-up lawsuit.  The state legislature has to assign investigators to each complaint.  I haven&#8217;t read much about the woman in question, but no doubt we&#8217;ll find she&#8217;s a hard-left lib who can&#8217;t stand the idea of a hard-working conservative woman doing well for herself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John in CA</title>
		<link>http://gayconservative.org/2009/07/05/sarahs-reason/#comment-7963</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John in CA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gayconservative.org/?p=1689#comment-7963</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;I have to agree with you, Philip. I think the honeymoon will soon be over and Obama will not be nearly as well-loved by the time 2010 rolls around. Jimmy Carter will have a higher popularity than Obama will.&quot;

LOL!   On Mel that&#039;s cold.  It&#039;s true but it is cold.   

As for Sarah Palin, I saw on the news last weekend one woman in Alaska has file four ethics complaints against her?  Isn&#039;t there limits to such things?   Who pays for the investigations of these complaints?   This woman sounds like one of those people who sues anyone she can in small claims court over and over.   Also, four complaints is harassment.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I have to agree with you, Philip. I think the honeymoon will soon be over and Obama will not be nearly as well-loved by the time 2010 rolls around. Jimmy Carter will have a higher popularity than Obama will.&#8221;</p>
<p>LOL!   On Mel that&#8217;s cold.  It&#8217;s true but it is cold.   </p>
<p>As for Sarah Palin, I saw on the news last weekend one woman in Alaska has file four ethics complaints against her?  Isn&#8217;t there limits to such things?   Who pays for the investigations of these complaints?   This woman sounds like one of those people who sues anyone she can in small claims court over and over.   Also, four complaints is harassment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://gayconservative.org/2009/07/05/sarahs-reason/#comment-7961</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 14:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gayconservative.org/?p=1689#comment-7961</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mel &amp; Phil,

I agree with that and know its happening just by listening to everyone talk.  People are hurting right now and all are starting to blame the current administration and government and understanding what Republicans meant during the election.  

Charles Krauthammer and Bill Kristol yesterday were talking (separately) about Sarah&#039;s resignation.  Charles summed it up best by saying &quot;she&#039;ll be back!&quot;  They also mentioned that right now Sarah Palin is the most popular Republican on the scene and the position of Governorship is straining on her growth in the larger-lower 48.  

Of course, liberal Juan Williams on the same program began stating how it was awful that she &quot;abandoned&quot; her constituents just as Murkowski (another Republican and rival of Palin&#039;s after Palin destroyed her father in the last election) had said.  But Bill reminded him that Obama was just elected Senator when he &quot;abandoned&quot; his state to make a Presidential run.

The good news is: everything Palin is taking advantage of now and will take advantage of through 2012, the platform itself was set up by the Democrats in 2008, so watching them try and say &quot;bad-bad-bad!&quot; to it all as Juan began yesterday will be amusing to say the least.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mel &amp; Phil,</p>
<p>I agree with that and know its happening just by listening to everyone talk.  People are hurting right now and all are starting to blame the current administration and government and understanding what Republicans meant during the election.  </p>
<p>Charles Krauthammer and Bill Kristol yesterday were talking (separately) about Sarah&#8217;s resignation.  Charles summed it up best by saying &#8220;she&#8217;ll be back!&#8221;  They also mentioned that right now Sarah Palin is the most popular Republican on the scene and the position of Governorship is straining on her growth in the larger-lower 48.  </p>
<p>Of course, liberal Juan Williams on the same program began stating how it was awful that she &#8220;abandoned&#8221; her constituents just as Murkowski (another Republican and rival of Palin&#8217;s after Palin destroyed her father in the last election) had said.  But Bill reminded him that Obama was just elected Senator when he &#8220;abandoned&#8221; his state to make a Presidential run.</p>
<p>The good news is: everything Palin is taking advantage of now and will take advantage of through 2012, the platform itself was set up by the Democrats in 2008, so watching them try and say &#8220;bad-bad-bad!&#8221; to it all as Juan began yesterday will be amusing to say the least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: melmaguire</title>
		<link>http://gayconservative.org/2009/07/05/sarahs-reason/#comment-7959</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[melmaguire]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 03:27:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gayconservative.org/?p=1689#comment-7959</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have to agree with you, Philip.  I think the honeymoon will soon be over and Obama will not be nearly as well-loved by the time 2010 rolls around.  Jimmy Carter will have a higher popularity than Obama will.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with you, Philip.  I think the honeymoon will soon be over and Obama will not be nearly as well-loved by the time 2010 rolls around.  Jimmy Carter will have a higher popularity than Obama will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steveflesher</title>
		<link>http://gayconservative.org/2009/07/05/sarahs-reason/#comment-7958</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[steveflesher]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 21:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gayconservative.org/?p=1689#comment-7958</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, I am returning to the first principle in selecting a good candidate: pick the one the liberals hate the most.

With that said, PALIN2012!  ;-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I am returning to the first principle in selecting a good candidate: pick the one the liberals hate the most.</p>
<p>With that said, PALIN2012!  <img src='http://s1.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

