Having Fun With “Racism”


Boy, I have to tell you.  This Pfleger fella really is cashing in on the new boom known as the racist-complex in the same way Eminem cashed in on ‘white boys growin’ up in da ghetto.’

In fact, Ann Coulter humorously pointed this out on H&C this week: “I love this guy, he’s like Eminem” and labeled him the “white Reverend Wright!” 

Assuming that Obama picks up the nomination, babboons like this really are going to make this country great again by showing Americans how hideous and opportunistic they are.

What a better gimmick than coming out as the religious Eminem?  And how many see a book being written and published within the next six months?

People like me though would love a serious discussion and not a “sermon.”

When will these folks at least acknowledge the fact that everyone has equal rights now?  We all determine our own destiny and life is cause and effect. 

I’m white.  I live a good life with good friends, a secure job, and a good education – as does Phil – my site partner.  But, I am really bored with these people suggesting that I have to give some of it up to some non-existant cause all in the name of preaching a sermon to get yourself famous. 

Will he give up the attention?  Will he give up money earned from future book sales?  I doubt it.

During tax season, I work a grueling 16 hours a day.  I work Sundays.  Often times at night, I came home to work on homework, not getting to bed until 3am, only to wake up and make it to work by 10am to start it all over again.

And I am sure Phil can attest to late night cram sessions in pursuing his various degrees.

These lazy ass opportunists really need to shut up.  The Jews aren’t crying and demanding reparations from the Christians and if we were to compare blacks to Jews in the form of torture, I’m sorry, but the Jews win hands down.

Africans founded slavery themselves.  They gave birth to children for the sole purpose of selling them for profit.  Who did they sell them to?  White Europeans! 

If Africans (and not all of them are this idiotic) want reparations from past generations, how about they start with their own that sold their own for profit? 

They were legit purchases.  It’s the way it was, and we owe them absolutely nothing!  Do we agree with it?  Of course not!  It was barbaric and stupid.  But it wasn’t at the fault of the white man.

And more politcally correct Americans need to stand up and voice this – especially in the months to come.

This man – Pfleger is purposely insulting the intelligence of hard-working African Americans.  Does he really believe that the people standing up and shouting behind him are not shouting for any other reason than his endorsement of Obama?

Condoleezza Rice should accept McCain’s invitation.  This would open the eyes up of all Americans and show the true difference between an opportunist and the product of true hard work, education, and determination.  You know, what equality offers us all.

Vice-President Rice?

Inspired by my comment on Phil’s last post, I read the top 20 articles/web sites on the possibility of Rice as a running mate for John McCain.  The positives of Rice obviously are her age, her foreign policy experience, her intelligence, and her energy.  To negative; according to articles in the liberal news outlets state her immediate ties to Bush’s “failed” Iraq strategy.

Also on liberal-slam sites, liberals are having a hissy fit over it.  That’s a positive for me.  Many suspect her social policies are moderate including gay marriage, abortion, etc.  But her stance on fighting terrorism; in my opinion, would be the perfect add-in to the McCain ticket.

I stumbled upon this report with regard to the state of New York written in April.  Check it out.  It shows a McCain/Rice ticket winning in the state of New York over both a Clinton/Obama and a Obama/Clinton ticket.

The other choices fail.  I think it’d be interesting to have a Republican win in the state of New York. 

Share your likes, dislikes, and concerns.  Moreover; how do you see her as an eligible Presidential candidate in 2012?


The End is Near (For Ron Paul)


And thank God.  Paul and his supporters are just downright frightening.

His supporters on YouTube are so desperate that they are posting videos of him attempting to challenge Condoleezza Rice and proclaiming him the winner after it is so clear in this video that Paul got his clocked officially cleaned out with facts by Rice.

Paul’s conclusion at the end of the day?  Of course — America should stick its neck in the sand as Carter did in 1979 that gave Islamic crazies their first strong foothold.

Thank God, this is a modern ideology that hasn’t moved past the popularity of the 9/11 Truthers Movement.

The Turkish End-Around

My posts on foreign matters don’t usually seem to invite many comments.  But this one should invoke a lot of serious thought – not only about our foreign policy but also about the people we elect to Congress.  If you don’t like profanity, I’d suggest you stop reading here.  I’m mad as hell, and I’m going to let you know about it.

Democrats in Congress are prepared to approve a resolution condemning the mass killings of Armenians by the Turks – A CENTURY AGO!!!  Dear God.  I love history, but I don’t know all the facts about the Ottoman Turk actions against Armenians in the WWI era.  What I do know is this – IT WAS 100 YEARS AGO.  What the hell???

Read this……

 Our Secretary of State has been relegated to apologizing to our ally, Turkey, for a potential resolution in Congress regarding something that happened 100 YEARS AGO!!!  Instead of dealing with more important matters like social security, taxes, crime or education – this failure of a Congress (led by Democrats) is intent on antagonizing a strategic ally of the US to the point that they have recalled their ambassador.

Our supplies to Iraq are routed through Turkey.  An overwhelming percentage of all the weapons, food, fuel, etc. destined for our troops in Iraq make their way through Turkey.  I have a hard time believing that this is anything less than an attempt by Dems to strain relations with Turkey in order to undermine our mission in Iraq.  Similar resolutions in past years were passed before this.  Why are they choosing NOW to repeat this crap? This is pure, unadulterated bullshit.

Democrats have no conscience.  Where was their outrage over the torture chambers and killing that existed under Sadaam Hussein?  They’re suddenly outraged at an event that happened 100 YEARS AGO? Everything that these numbskulls do is politically calculated BS.  They don’t have the backbone to show their faces and cut off funding for the war in Iraq.  So they take a back door and threaten to approve a pathetically meaningless resolution that embarrasses a key ally of the US.

People – wake the hell up!  The Dem leadership in Congress is doing everything in their power to hurt this nation.  They claim, out of one side of their mouth, to want to improve our image abroad.  Then they go and pull this shit to make us look like idots.  To put things into perspective, France’s parliament passed a similar resolution condemning Turkey.  Do you want to be associated on that level???

This resolution passed the committe by a vote of 27-21.  The Bush administration has been hard at work lobbying against the measure.  If the House approves this measure in a floor vote, then you can be sure that Turkey will cut us off.  They will severe the supply routes to Iraq.  They will take actions that hurt our troops.  They will launch an attack into northern Iraq to quell the Kurds.  They will destabilize the only region of Iraq that has been consistently quiet.

If you don’t believe that this Dem move is coldly calculated – you are living in an alternate universe.  These assholes know exactly what they are doing.  To all of you Republicans who voted these idiots into office with your protest votes or abstentions – how is this working out for you?  How does it feel?

The 2008 elections are a war.  Everyday that I watch these Dem dipshits in Congress, I am more motivated.  This one just takes the cake.

Some of us just aren’t fooled

Since the late 90’s when so-called minorities started to “come out of the closet”, liberals have always had a fascinating way of dealing with them.  Call me crazy, but I’m pretty sure it had something to do with the Clinton administration’s “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell” policy along with the fact that unlike either Bushes, Bill Clinton failed to appoint an African-American to a position of high power.

As has been well documented by anyone with one eye and half of a brain, the closest African-American to President Clinton was his personal secretary — Betty Curry.  Remember the praise Clinton received for appointing the first female Secretary of State?

How about the praise Johnson got for appointing Justice Thurgood Marshall to the Supreme Court fresh out of the Civil Rights movement?  Back when white-Democrats didn’t mind avoiding “alleged” litmus tests for justices, Johnson was sure to be the first politically correct Democrat by making sure a judge would sit on the Supreme Court that did his best to defend hardened criminals who raped and murdered, worked feverishly with William Brennan to whole-heartedly support abortion rights and oppose the death penalty which led to dire consequences (oh yeah, he was black, too).  Convicted felons were leashed onto America by the thousands because of previously issued opinions of the Warren Court, where just one year earlier before Marshall came on, Miranda v. Arizona (1966) basically stripped the police of the ability to gain confessions.  At this point, the “avoided” litmus test for judicial insanity was running strong among the most liberal court in the history of this country — thus, Thurgood Marshall was appointed because he passed the “insanity test” even though the majority of the country (aside from the Lennon-lovers and Vietnam draft-dodgers) lived in fear of the kinds of opinions he was issuing.  Johnson boasted of his “historic” decision to appoint an African American by proclaiming that the majority of black-baby-boys would be named “Thurgood” in honor of his choice.  Historian, Doris Kearns Goodwin researched medical records in New York and Boston shortly thereafter and sadly, Johnson’s prediction utterly flopped — even the blacks that were just granted Civil Rights a few years earlier didn’t like this new justice!  Nonetheless, this was celebrated and like the case of Bill Clinton with Madeline Albright, Johnson was slurped up one side and down the next by white liberals who love crime and the baby-killing procedure known as abortion.

Upon announcement of Thurgood Marshall’s retirement, you would have thought that President George H.W. Bush would have received rave reviews for replacing him with another African-American — a true Justice — Clarence Thomas.  But unfortunately it took white-liberals all over the country all of five minutes to begin labeling Thomas as “Uncle Tom” or “Uncle Clarence.”  Somehow the love of promoting African-Americans to positions of higher power had managed to fizzle amongst the “Ebony and Ivory” crowd.

Since Clinton was elected in 1992, I have no choice but to flash forward eight entire years to highlight the next set of African American Promotees —

Under President George W. Bush, we had the first black Secretary of State, Colin Powell.  By the time this announcement was made, liberals had already decided that Bush was a war-mongering hater of anyone that was not white, straight, or rich.  Unfortunately, pausing for a moment to document this massive history-making promotion would have directly contradicted their position.  After all, coming up with a new lie would have required energy.

Soon thereafter, Bush also appointed women to the Federal Appeals Court.  One in particular was African-American, the brilliant Janice Rogers-Brown.  This black woman was loved so much by white liberals in Congress that they filibustered her nomination for two years before she finally got to go to work. 

Finally, let’s not forget Condoleezza Rice.  The first-ever black-female Secretary of State.  The woman who learned Beethoven by the age of five, the woman who graduated college at the age of 19 and was already teaching at Stanford by the age of 26.  When liberal cartoonist Jeff Danziger got news of the nomination, he celebrated this moment of equal rights by publishing racist cartoons of Condi:


Bless the hearts of all those elitist and equality-loving liberals!!

When taking into consideration the overwhelming evidence of liberals’ blatant racism, I think it is safe to say that in any sane world outside of San Francisco, most Americans now know which party truly cares about equality for blacks. 

Given the fact that this liberal-trick isn’t working anymore, straight liberals have moved on to claim possession of the gays.  White liberals like Bill Richardson, Howard Dean, and most recently, Elizabeth Edwards run around talking big-talk when it’s time to rally votes.  Considering the latest development that gays also have an incredible sense of style, Elizabeth has even managed to steal-away a fabulous hairdresser for John.

I have to say that these various articles written about me (and other gay conservatives like Kevin-QueerConservative) are beginning to remind me of what white-liberals are saying about the blacks.  The only difference is, these things are being said by members of my own community.

Before I move forward, I would like to point out a few Republican v. Democrats issues regarding the gay community:

  • In 2000, after the Vermont ruling, gay activists got cocky and were ready to start putting the test of gay-marriage to acts of Democracy.  What better place to start than California, right?  After Proposition 22 (to keep marriage between man and woman) passed overwhelmingly in the most liberal state in the land, activists did what they have always done best: silence their opposition and return to the courts for their victories.  Thus, explaining their mad campaign in May of 2000 against Dr. Laura Schlessinger for something she said on December 8, 1998.  (message for the future Matthew Shepards of the world: if you want true justice for crimes committed against you, it’s not a good idea to wait for GLAAD to respond.)  After the passing of Proposition 22, it became apparent that whomever was going to be in the White House shortly thereafter was going to have to respond to the voice of the people on this issue since GLAAD had returned full-force to their old trick of pressuring liberal-judges to handing them their victories on silver platters.  Listen up fellow gays — it did not matter if it was George Bush, it did not matter if it was Al Gore, somehow and someway the President of the United States was asked by the people to respond to this on a national level.  This of course led to the Federal Marriage Amendment.  Boy did Clinton get out just in the knick of time!
  • After the Federal Marriage Amendment was introduced to the country, Americans voted and voted overwhelmingly on mandates against gay marriage.  In California, gays were sold out by the straight liberals in 2000 with Proposition 22.  In Oregon, straight liberals voted overwhelmingly against gay marriage by 73%.  (Bush got 37% of the vote in the general election for Oregon that same year.)
  • Arizona rejected the ban on gay marriage.  (A red state where Bush won 55% of the  vote and a state that overwhelmingly rejects abortion.) 
  • In the 2004 debates, John Kerry vocally admitted opposition to gay marriage.
  • By in large, most of the gays I know make nice-sized incomes and are certainly enjoying the Bush tax-cuts (even if they don’t admit it.)
  • Currently in 2007, Democrats like Sheila Jackson-Lee are trying to convince us that they want irrationally detailed “hate-crimes” bills passed (because they really, really like us) while they simutaneously want criminals pardoned like Tookie Williams by the types of judges described above.  If you were the victim of a beating, would you want your attacker going before that crowd when it was time for justice to be served?

After I posted a brief and somewhat light reply to a liberal-gay man who decided to vocally express his concerns toward myself and other members of the gay-conservative community like Kevin, I did receive e-mails and I did get some comments from one of his readers.  (Frankly I’ve been too busy having fun and irritating the atheists lately.)  In addition to this, other posts have followed on the same websites along with discussion that basically boils down to one age-old question: “how can someone be gay and conservative?” 

Let me be clear by pointing out the fact that I was not “ripping” a new one to anybody.  I have been a Republican since 2000 and have faced far worse adversity within my own community than anything the original article said about me.

The only thing that saddens me is how members of the gay community within this country have allowed themselves to become sheep for the Clintons, for Howard Dean, for John Kerry, and Bill Richardson when these politicians have all factually declared that they have no interest whatsoever in advancing the rights for gays to marry.  This point will be especially re-confirmed all through 2008 as Hillary will be doing her damndest to prove that she does; in fact, believe in God and really does have “religious values.”

So in conclusion, while some other members of our community are out celebrating abortions, hugging trees, and sweating over global-cooling (ooops I forgot, this isn’t the 70’s!) and allow themselves to continue to be snowed by straight liberals, there are a few of us like myself, Steve YuhasJeff GannonKevin, Patrick, and Philip who tend to think outside the realms of Gayville.  All evidence proves that the goal of the Democratic party remains to keep blacks and gays in a sick-victim state to serve at their electoral pleasure.

Noticing this requires objectivity, something that is crucially missing from our community. Until gays wise up, I’m happy to be the “self-loather” and the “Uncle Tom” of the gay community.  Anyone else care to join me?

Racist Democrats Play the Race Card AGAIN


So Kathy Griffin and every other liberal who have jumped on this are finally deciding that after all of Condoleezza Rice’s service for this country that she represents how bad the white man is. 

I suppose Kathy Griffin could do a fair comparison if we could find one Democratic administration who would promote a black to a position of higher power.  Let’s see, who has Bush appointed?

  • Clarence Thomas (SCOTUS)
  • Janice Rogers-Brown (Federal Appellate Court Judge – also filibustered by Democrats)
  • Colin Powell (Secretary of State) 1st Black
  • Condoleezza Rice (Secretary of State) 1st Black-Female
  • Judge Reggie Walton (Coincidentally the same black who gave Scooter Libby 30 months in prison and a 250K fine.)

I guess we could compare how the blacks were treated in the Bush administration to such positions of high power, but the last I had heard is that the black female closest to Clinton was his secretary, Betty Curry (pointed out by Ann Coulter of 6/5/2007 H&C).

So, liberals come on!  Write Teddy Kennedy, Barbara Boxer, Nancy Pelosi, and Hillary Clinton (not to mention Barrack), and tell them to appoint more blacks to positions of high power.

Until liberals stop projecting so much hate and superiority to blacks by refusing to promote them, I just don’t think we could make a fair comparison.