North Korea Barks Again

I’m loving it.  The US and South Korea are going to do the war game thing in the East China Sea.  North Korea is screaming.

The North routinely threatens attacks whenever South Korea and the U.S. hold joint military drills, which Pyongyang sees as a rehearsal for an invasion. The U.S. keeps 28,500 troops in South Korea and another 50,000 in Japan, but says it has no intention of invading the North.

Still, the North’s latest rhetoric threatening “nuclear deterrence” and “sacred war” carries extra weight following the sinking of a South Korean warship that killed 46 sailors. Seoul and Washington say a North Korean torpedo was responsible for the March sinking of the Cheonan, considered the worst military attack on the South since the 1950-53 Korean War.

The American and South Korean defense chiefs announced earlier in the week they would stage the military drills to send a clear message to North Korea to stop its “aggressive” behavior

This could be a very serious turning point on the North Korea issue.  The US (surprisingly) added additional sanctions in response to the sinking of the South Korean warship.  Hillary actually went to the Korean demilitarized zone along with Defense Secretary Gates and made a show of force aimed at Kim Jong-Il.  Seems like the Obama administration is rattling some sabers to detract from their domestic woes.  Either that, or Hillary has gone rogue in order to boost her chances to unseat Obama in 2012.  Either way – I’m impressed.  North Korea is on the defensive.

I would be thrilled to see NK make a militaristic move.  That would invite excused retaliation.  Obama might even invite the attack on a fellow Marxist.

Hopefully, we’ll go ballistic on them and put them down.  North Korea is a major threat to worldwide peace.  They are suspected of aiding the dictatorship in Burma with a nascent nuclear program.  Throw in their aid to Iran and Syria.  These guys are no good.

If the world community had the balls to eliminate the North Korean regime, they would save themselves a lot of headaches in the future.

Oh Really????

Despite the fact that Saturday Night Live tends to focus an overwhelming majority of their political potshots on Republicans, I still enjoy the show from time-to-time.  For those of you unfamiliar with SNL – The “Weekend Update” segment of the show occasionally features a series called “Oh Really?’ where the “anchors” choose a person(s) who has done something boneheaded without any thought of the ramifications of their actions.  The mocking of the bonehead in question is merciless and hilarious.

I couldn’t get this out of my head as I read this article posted on

In a swift about face from her views as New York’s senator, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is now hammering Israel over its treatment of Palestinians in Gaza.

As First Lady, Clinton raised eyebrows when she kissed Suha Arafat.

Since she was then seeking a Senate seat the resulting brouhaha caused her to “re-think” her positions.

“I’m a very strong supporter of Israel,” Clinton said back in February 2000.

On Thursday, as Secretary of State she had yet another about face in the form of angry messages demanding Israel speed up aid to Gaza. Jewish leaders are furious.

And then comes this reaction to Hillary’s about-face –

“I am very surprised, frankly, at this statement from the United States government and from the secretary of state,” said Mortimer Zuckerman, publisher of the New York Daily News and member of the NYC Jewish Community Relations Council.

“I liked her a lot more as a senator from New York,” Assemblyman Dov Hikind, D-Brooklyn, said. “Now, I wonder as I used to wonder who the real Hillary Clinton is.”


So you elect Democrats who are merely paying lip-service to American Jews with their “support” of Israel and then expect that these createns will hold true to their word?  You elect a guy who diminishes the Iranian threat and supports measures to stifle the war on terror, then expect he will stare down Hamas and support the state of Israel?


I have frequently mentioned Mark Davis here before.  He is our local conservative talkshow host on WBAP 820 AM and is a sometimes-guest fill-in for Rush Limbaugh.  Mark has often wondered how American Jews have become such a reliable constituency for the Democrats.  He believes, as do I, that those Jewish voters have a “cavalier” attitude towards Israel.  In other words – these Jewish voters have decided that their domestic political interests outweigh any allegiance they may have towards the state of Israel and their heritage.  Davis believes that this is their right and their prerogative.  I agree with that.

But, when I hear of American Jews suddenly disenchanted with the anti-Israeli actions and rhetoric coming from the Democrats – I am dumbfounded to the point of hysterical laughter.  What planet must you be on to believe that the Democrats will ultimately stand behind Israel?  Their neophyte President aligned himself with anti-Semites and doesn’t have any record on anything of national significance – much less foreign policy.  Yet a big majority of Jewish voters took a gamble.  And now they will lose out –

Clinton’s decision to hammer Israel comes as the Clintons and President Barack Obama are planning to give the Palestinians $900 million toward the rebuilding of Gaza in the wake of the Israeli offensive that was sparked by Hamas rocket fire.

The majority of American Jews voted for him.  Now they’re stuck with him.  And let me add yet another apology to Steve regarding this election.  Steve was beside himself that Hillary would be the next Secretary of State.  I responded with hope that she would temper Obama’s foreign policy.  I was wrong.  Hillary Clinton is as morally bankrupt as the rest of her party.  She will toe the Obama line evidently. Democrats have historically shown a propensity to change positions as often as most people change their underwear.  And Hillary’s husband was the poster child for such maddening fickleness.

So yeah – “really.”  I doubt this will change any hearts amongst the Jewish Dems.  And I’m sure that the Democrats and Obama will temper rhetoric sufficiently to curb some of the criticism.  After all – they need the money and votes that come with the Jewish community in America.  Thank God Netanyahu’s rise to power coincided with this election.  The Israeli people will need his strength and courage to offset the damage that will be done by Obama’s policy towards Israel.  I truly believe providence is at work.

Horrible Hillary as Sec of State: The First Time I’ve Agreed With Hitchens


He cannot be more right this time.  Watch the liberals and Chris Matthews get all defensive.

As you know, I wrote about this about a week ago and this is honestly one of the most embarrassing choices ever for such a powerful position.

The End Times Draw Near

I continue to watch in awe and amazement at the cabinet that President Obama is assembling.  Yes, that’s right.  Say it with me – “President Obama.”  Hurts doesn’t it?  Can you believe that we have arrived at this sorry place in American history?  Look at the characters he has brought up (or is about to bring up) from the pits of Hell to serve him.

Hillary Clinton, Bill Richardson, Tom Daschle, Eric Holder, Rahm Emanuel, Janet Napolitano. 

I was going to go down the list and give a detailed rundown on each person.  But it’s pointless.  My head is spinning.  Does anyone understand the implications here?

 Bill Richardson gave us a nuclear North Korea.  Holder was the #2 in the Clinton Justice Department who urged the pardon of Marc Rich.  Tom Daschle is a leftist, Senate has-been who will push through universal health care (or some version thereof).  Emanuel is a fierce partisan who sends dead fish to people and stabs knives into furniture in order to make his point.  Napolitano is an utterly unqualified governor who will be entrusted with protecting us from another 9/11.

And Hillary?  Dear God.  I dismissed her chances, but now it seems to be happening.  What the hell are Obama and Hill thinking?  I will still say that I could think of worse possibilities for the State Department.  But I just can’t fathom this.  I hope this one comes back to bite him.

Folks, we made a mistake.  We didn’t rally behind Fred Thompson, Duncan Hunter or another true conservative.  Then, when they were gone, we didn’t get behind Mitt Romney.  That left us with McCain.  We tried to get behind him, but it didn’t work.  And now we have President Obama, Secretary of State Clinton, Chief of Staff Emanuel, Secretary of Commerce Richardson, Attorney General Holder, Secretary of Homeland Security Napolitano, Secretary Of Health and Human Sevices Daschle.

See where I am going?

I’m sick at my stomach and afraid of who Obama will appoint next.  You think it’s too soon to think about 2010 or 2012?  Think again.  We better start thinking now.  And we better think fast.  This shit is getting heavy, and we’re about to be steeped and entrenched in a dangerous scary place.  This cast of characters is frightening.  And it will only get worse.

Now Steve.  Now my head is exploding.

Hillary to be Secretary of State (Sadly, I’m Not Kidding)


Is this Obama’s idea of a sick joke?  Even if she does not get the position, the idea that she is “among the candidates” being considered for the job gives us a pretty good perception of where the Obama camp is heading in terms of insanity.

Let’s take a look at the last few Secretaries of State:

Madeleine Albright: daughter of Josef Korbel, Founding Dean of the Graduate School of International Studies.   Albright herself studied at the same school.  Under the Carter Administration, she served as an official responsible for the formulation of foreign policy legislation.  She went on to serve at the Smithsonian Institution for effective political changes in Poland.  Served as a Senior Fellow in Soviet and Eastern European Affairs at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.  She worked for the United Nations, the list goes on and on, and even though she moved on through life with a bit of a “moonbat” mentality, one could hardly argue her qualifications.

Colin Powell: A Lieutenant Colonel who served in South Korea, assisted in the 1983 invasion of Grenada and the airstike on Libya in 1986, served as Reagan’s National Security Advisor, and went on to serve as the 12th chairman on the Joint Chiefs of Staff in the Department of Defense.  Not a bad choice.

Condoleezza Rice: Studies International Studies (actually under Albright’s father), received her PhD in Political Science from the Graduate School of International Studies, served as the Soviet Expert to Brent Scowcroft (National Security Advisor during G.H.W. Bush’s tenure), served as an international affairs fellow of the Council on Foreign Relations in 1986 where she was assistant to Director of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.  She then served as the Senior Director of Soviet and East European Affairs in the National Security Council.  Rice then served as National Security Advisor from 2001-2005 and finally earning her well-deserved title as Secretary of State in 2005.  Not a bad choice.

Can someone out there please tell me, what the hell is Obama thinking?  Hillary Clinton has no experience whatsoever in International Studies in the depth required to seriously assume this position.  I will concede that she is an accomplished woman in many areas of the law (not to mention a humble one who’s suffered the lessons of humility more than a few times) and can debate her way through domestic social issues regarding domestic tax and health care policy. 

Could it be that Obama is simply stripping a Senator away from a very safe Democratic state?  Or is this his way of saying “I’m sorry!” for stealing the primary?

This is serious; something that all of our lives are depending upon.  I will leave Phil to analyze this further, but knowing how interested Phil is in international relations, I’m scared his head’s going to pop off when he finds out.

Laughable Liberal Women: Why They Really Hate Sarah Palin


Wow – after two days of tax school; preparing myself for the upcoming filing season, I was exhausted, came home, and fell asleep and now I’m sitting here in the wee hours totally energized and scanning the net on various “news” stories.  This one; posted on The Harvard Crimson by Claire Guehenno really attempts to go further than any smear-article ever could on Palin.  You can read the article but be prepared to vomit.  I have decided to begin with a quote from the article and paste the comment I left on the web site:

“Gov. Sarah Palin has disappeared from national politics and returned to her governorship in Alaska—at least until the 2012 campaigns get going—and I couldn’t be happier.”

Are you blind, deaf, or both?

Let’s see, she did a two-day interview with Matt Lauer, a two-day interview with Wolf Blitzer, a three-day interview with Greta Van Susteran, and is having her door blown down by Oprah Winfrey, Barbara Walters, and Larry King as well.

In fact; even profound writers like Claire Guehenno cannot seem to shut up about Gov. Palin.  Gee, I wonder why.

The oppressed, modern-day liberal women are terrified that a conservative woman can be accomplished.

Sarah Palin is a college graduate (oh, and she’s pro-life, too!).

Sarah Palin was mayor of Wasilla giving her executive experience (oh, and she’s pro-life, too!).

Sarah Palin was elected governor of Alaska in a landslide victory (oh, and she’s pro-life, too!).

Sarah Palin’s tenure as governor gave her the highest approval rating as a governor ever in this country and even more executive experience (oh, and she’s pro-life, too!).

Sarah Palin has one (yes, only one!) husband (yes, a husband!) who’s never cheated on her, who she loves with all her heart and had five gorgeous, beautiful, polite, and patriotic children with (oh, and she’s pro-life, too!).

She lowered spending, gave up Governor luxuries like a private jet and chef, did right by her constituents; because, after all this is why people should choose public service which is to serve with a servant’s heart.

Of course liberal women are going to support Hillary Clinton: a woman who sacrificed her self-respect as a woman to allow her sleaze-dog husband to cheat on her repeatedly and stay with him for the sake of staying in the public eye, a woman who still has no executive experience whatsoever, but manages to support the worst abortion procedures ever.

The fact is that Sarah Palin is a total representative of feminism.  The strongest, self-sufficient woman available in this country who can fight with the boys, get dirty, and make pointless liberal women cry over elk, polar bears, and wolves while they celebrate 40 million abortions.

While supporting 40 millions abortions, they cry over hardened criminals on death row, terrorists held at Guantanamo, and hairy uncivilized creatures in Alaska.

The difference in the “choice” is the types of life both sides are fighting for.  Babies are innocent and maybe just one of those 40 million aborted could have had the cure for cancer, could have been the next Van Gogh or Martin Luther King. 

Palin chooses the quality, while liberal women choose the garbage.

The same can be said for their sex lives.  I guarantee you, Todd Palin will never need to use viagra.  The Palins will never have to advertise for extras or swingers to come in to “spice up their love life.”  They will never need the use of pornographic materials to make eachother’s toes curl.  They won’t need toys operated by batteries to do the job.

There’s something about trust and fidelity that seems to trump those modern day quick solutions.

The bottom line: today’s women’s groups are not “pro-woman.”  They are “pro-abortion.”  Sarah Palin is a better person than any liberal woman could ever be, both inside and out.

They hate her because she’s gorgeous, because she’s appealing, because she’s pro-life, and because she knows how to hunt.  Everything feminism originally stood for, she plowed right through.

And if you think this is the last time you will write anything about her, you’re sadly mistaken.

You can keep hating her if you want, or you can simply join her by becoming a better person.

Democrat Double Standards

So far, several celebrities have voiced their opinion of Sarah Palin as McCain’s VP pick.  As we should have expected, I guess, it’s not pretty.  It’s amazing to me just how defensive they were about Hillary when she was up for the Democratic nod because she’s a woman.  When the woman is a conservative Republican, though, it’s a different story!

Candace Bergen said the idea of Palin as VP was “frightening.”  The hosts of The View, including Whoopi Goldberg, have castigated Palin at every turn, spewing rumor after rumor and refusing in most cases to apologize and make a retraction after the rumors are soundly debunked.  Most recently, pretty-boy Matt Damon said it would be like “a bad Disney movie.”  When asked to elaborate, he said, “you do the actuary tables, there’s a one out of three chance, if not more, that McCain doesn’t survive his first term, and it’ll be President Palin.  It’s like a really bad Disney movie, ‘The Hockey Mom.’  ‘Oh, I’m just a hockey mom from Alaska!’ and she’s President.  She’s facing down Vladimir Putin and using the folksy stuff she learned at the hockey rink.  It’s absurd!”

Uh…Matt…how much less absurd is the idea that Barack Obama’s “experience” will do him any better?  Obama launched his career with the help of home-grown terrorist Bill Ayers, then conducted his campaign with money donated by slumlord and powermonger Tony Rezko and his ilk (including Iraqi billionaire Nadhmi Auchi, who was a member of Saddam’s Baath party and sold him high-quality military equipment and was later involved in the scandal-ridden Oil-for-Food program).  Both Auchi and Rezko have been convicted of fraud, and Rezko is about to go on trial AGAIN for even more fraud!  But hey, Matt’s not worried about the company Barack keeps.  He’s The One, he preaches “change” and he’s not a Republican.  What more could a rich actor wish for in a Presidential candidate?

Exactly what qualifies Matt Damon–or any of these other high-society, low-class celebrities–to pass judgment on any candidate?  Their beliefs?  If all it took was a strong belief to make one an expert, I’d be raking in the bucks with my writing.  And why do we put so much stock in what these adult brats have to say?  Why is it so important?  They never give unbiased opinions.  Everything with them, like all liberals, is based on emotions.

Matt Damon pointing out Palin’s “inexperience” is what’s really absurd.

Hillary Supporters For Palin…More than just a Rumor!

Remember this woman?


Harriet Christian was made a celebrity overnight when she went to Florida to fight for every vote for Hillary Clinton and vowed “I’ve got news for all of you, McCain will be the next president of the United States!”

She wasn’t kidding.  Just three days ago, the following video was posted.  Neil Cavuto had Ms. Christian on to discuss Sarah Palin and the media’s portrayal of her over the last week. 


On top of this, the following websites are now in place:

Those are just a few.

Since Palin hit the scene last week, all of the Clinton-For-McCain websites are getting much more involved in making sure the media does not get away with sexist remarks and also encouraging McCain/Palin supporters to watch out for voter fraud.  Most Clinton supporters contend – as Harriet Christian once did – that going to the caucuses and to various polling sites gave Clinton supporters a frustrating experience all claiming that they could not even get a ticket.

Although my very handsome and wonderfully bright site-partner Philip sticks to his conservative guns and shows no sympathy for Hillary, I contend that something certainly went wrong with this process.  I believe the Clinton supporters and truly understand why they’re pissed off.

But what’s in question is the future of Hillary and the Democratic party as a whole?

1.) Hillary Clinton herself was responsible for many of the factual findings and bringing to light the relations of Barack Obama and Tony Rezko, along with his relations with Reverend Wright.  Suddenly now, the Obama campaign is passing these issues off as Republican-attacks.  Moreover; the liberal media’s creation of the Muslim myth was used; as we all know by now, as a means to set up a strawman to destroy it to a.) breathe life into Obama’s credibility and b.) distract from the real issues of his character such as Tony Rezko, Reverend Wright, and William Ayers.

2.) Now that Sarah Palin is winning the hearts of Americans, she will have four years to reform Washington along with McCain quite possibly making her our frontrunner in 2012.  This will make it more difficult for Hillary to defeat her because Sarah will have given us the results we know she will deliver on and the fact that having a woman as part of the Executive branch will have already been well-established.

In my opinion (and it’s safe to say this now), Democrats could have quite possibly had two full terms with Hillary Clinton if she had been their front-runner.  Hillary took Ohio which has been very crucial in the last few national elections. 

Just how many Democrats; who stabbed Hillary in the back months ago, are kicking themselves right now?

Clinton Supporters Going for McCain…


I think we can thank Rev. Wright and Father Pfleger from the bottom of our hearts.

This video is amazingly revealing of the passion and anger of Hillary supporters.  The woman – though a little over-the-top proclaims Obama as an “inadequate black male.”  She also proclaims McCain will be the next President.

The video speaks for itself.